Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:smile: :sad: :eek: :shock: :cool: :-x :razz: :oops: :evil: :twisted: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :mrgreen:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by Casual Observer » Fri Oct 09, 2020 2:08 pm

pinback wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 10:09 am Our handling of the emails has been the kindest you could possibly imagine. Too kind, some will say, once the authorities are poring over them looking for clues.
LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by pinback » Fri Oct 09, 2020 10:09 am

Our handling of the emails has been the kindest you could possibly imagine. Too kind, some will say, once the authorities are poring over them looking for clues.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by RealNC » Fri Oct 09, 2020 10:05 am

So... no spirit of kindness?

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by pinback » Fri Oct 09, 2020 10:01 am

RetroRomper wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:24 am I'm done. Logging out.
Thankfully, since this unfortunate event, he has been able to focus on his other, more satisfying projects, and has been able to bring a renewed sense of positive energy to his daily life.



HAHAH just kidding, since mere hours (or less?) after the above post, he has been continually barraging ICJ and me with page-long, hysterical, psychotic emails, and also monitoring all of the public bases he still has read-access to here while lying about it ("someone told me Pinback made a poll about me" -- later admitted to be a quite obvious lie).

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by pinback » Thu Oct 08, 2020 3:30 pm

Also, they're not there.

Signed,

The Also, They're Not There Fairy

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by pinback » Thu Oct 08, 2020 3:28 pm

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote: Thu Oct 08, 2020 2:50 pm Okay, they should be there now.
WRONG THREAD!!

Signed,

The Wrong Thread Fairy

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Thu Oct 08, 2020 2:50 pm

Okay, they should be there now.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by pinback » Thu Oct 08, 2020 2:26 pm

In his defense, he never hid it from his wife.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by Casual Observer » Thu Oct 08, 2020 1:10 pm

Tdarcos wrote: Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:46 amI know the tendency toward addiction exists in my own family and I've caught myself leaning toward addictive behaviors. I am very appreciative that I find alcoholic beverages intolerable. It prevents me from having any interest in alcohol. I do know I have compulsive programming syndrome . . . .
Um, how about your food addiction???? The reason you lost your fucking leg?

Image

Addicts never want to admit to their own addiction, yours truly included.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by pinback » Thu Oct 08, 2020 10:54 am

Well, I feel like if he didn't have "me hiding drinking" to continually reference, we'd lose about 90% of his participation on this BBS.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by Billy Mays » Thu Oct 08, 2020 10:44 am

Tdarcos wrote: Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:46 am all kinds of stunts to hide your drinking, maybe to some extent trying to hide it from yourself. In such a case, if you hid it well, other people might not know or notice.
I'm the most outside person in this group and even I knew about his drinking, he brings it up more often than you do cobol and even created a thread to talk about beers he enjoys.

When is the last time you even read a post by someone here? I think you just see a block of words and immediately inject whatever you feel like talking about at that time. It's the only explanation.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Thu Oct 08, 2020 10:06 am

The kind thing to do was to give Retro a bit of a break.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by pinback » Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:58 am

Tdarcos wrote: Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:46 am
pinback wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:37 am They were private conversations between him and us, Paul. He had them because they were his.
Well, that brings up another question. You guys have history with him, and knew he's unstable from his time as DraalRanger, why would you trust him with things? Maybe I'm more cynical, but if I knew someone was unstable I'm not going to trust them with anything confidential or personal.
Nobody shared anything confidential or personal, that's why his posts weren't immediately deleted.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by Tdarcos » Thu Oct 08, 2020 9:46 am

pinback wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:37 am They were private conversations between him and us, Paul. He had them because they were his.
Well, that brings up another question. You guys have history with him, and knew he's unstable from his time as DraalRanger, why would you trust him with things? Maybe I'm more cynical, but if I knew someone was unstable I'm not going to trust them with anything confidential or personal.

Now if you did not know he was unstable, that's a different matter. But if you gave him these e-mails probably any time in 2020 I have to think that maybe you need to contemplate why you would trust someone who is compromised. You yourself admitted that you pulled all kinds of stunts to hide your drinking, maybe to some extent trying to hide it from yourself. In such a case, if you hid it well, other people might not know or notice. But if someone figured it out, they should not trust you as when one is an addict they might do things they'll regret later.

This is not intended to criticize you; I know the tendency toward addiction exists in my own family and I've caught myself leaning toward addictive behaviors. I am very appreciative that I find alcoholic beverages intolerable. It prevents me from having any interest in alcohol. I do know I have compulsive programming syndrome, most good programmers have it, and in our case, it tends to be a good "problem" to have as it will make us laser focused on our work, unfortunately sometimes to the exclusion of everything else. I discovered I had it when I read about it in The Psychology of Computer Programming by Gerald Weinberg, which I read around 1982 because it was an assigned book for one of my college courses, and I recommend it highly.

Thus if you know someone is mentally unstable or psychologically unstable (as in the case of an addict) you might not want to trust them over sensitive things until you know they have come out of and/or been treated for it.

So perhaps that's something you should consider in the future.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by The Happiness Engine » Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:49 pm

On the scale of bipolars I know, he's not currently "falling down the stairs naked in front of his family, his daughter, and her friends". So we got that going for us.

It's not an easy disease to treat.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by Jizaboz » Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:44 am

RetroRomper wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:09 am You need serious help
HaHahAHaHahAHaHahA!!!

I will leave you all to your own conclusions with this one.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by pinback » Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:37 am

They were private conversations between him and us, Paul. He had them because they were his.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by Tdarcos » Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:35 am

pinback wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:18 am You guys I bought vodka one weekend. You can tell from that private conversation Retro posted without my permission up there.
Just one thing, if that's a private conversation, how the hell did he get access to it? When Flack sends me his address in a PM, the only other person who can see it is Jonsey and maybe AArdvark who, since he has co-moderator privileges here I presume has power to take over in an emergency.

So, presuming, of course, that you did not give this to him, either it's not a private conversation (the way this is not), you held it where Retro is a sysop, or the other guy leaked it to him, Q.E.D.
pinback wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:18 am At this point all I'm worrying about emerging from intact is you mailing a bomb to my house, you raging lunatic.
How does he have your address? Now, of course, since he gave it to me, I know Flack's address, but, in my case, the only bomb he has to worry about me mailing him are bombed-out hard drives.
pinback wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:18 am Oh, and don't post people's private emails and conversations without their permission, asshole.
Valid point, but, again, if they are private, how is he getting them?

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by pinback » Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:28 am

The other possibility is that he's making shit up trying to get me fired, because I was mean to him on the internet. In an extraordinarily generous gesture, I'm going to assume that isn't it.

For now.

Re: Retro, you shouldn't post people's private emails without their permission.

by RetroRomper » Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:24 am

I'm done. Logging out.

Top