We've been trying to get a hold of you for OVER A MONTH regarding the Hugo thing on Wikipedia. For some reason, you fart out your opinion on every other goddamn topic but the one we want you to post on.
What is YOUR TAKE on what happened at the end of the Hugo discussion on Wikipedia? Here is the link in case you need it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... _language)
What it appears to me is that the following happened:
The originator of the delete request, Ramaksoud2000, is a fucking idiot that doesn't know anything. He recently got admin powers and it obviously went to his head.
A bunch of people show up in the discussion and say, no you stupid fuck, the Hugo article is fine.
Ramaksoud2000 can't handle it, argues with people (poorly, he was wrong about everything) and starts steaming because he's going to lose this one.
Ramaksoud2000, being a dumb fucking loser, also starts requesting "sock account investigations" but he's wrong about that, too. He is wrong about that because he is absolutely the dumbest and most worthless piece of shit on the Internet.
At the very end, another piece of human garbage, the user named "CZAR" claims ... I don't even know. "Canvassing" I guess he calls it. He does this 30 minutes before the decision is made by the "closer," because "CZAR" doesn't want there to actually be discussion because he's full of shit.
The "closer," whose account name is Jo-Jo Eumerus, is another fucking waste of space that sees a discussion with 6 people saying "keep it" and decides to delete/redirect.
So, IMO this is typical bureaucracy from Wikipedia. The people that spend all day on Wikipedia, like Ramaksoud2000, CZAR and the closer just tried to get over on the regular people with lives that actually know what they are talking about.
That is my take.
What is YOUR take. For the one time in the history of this BBS you don't need to limit or censor yourself. You know a lot about Wikipedia, I am interested in your opinion.
We've been trying to get a hold of you for OVER A MONTH regarding the Hugo thing on Wikipedia. For some reason, you fart out your opinion on every other goddamn topic but the one we want you to post on.
What is YOUR TAKE on what happened at the end of the Hugo discussion on Wikipedia? Here is the link in case you need it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hugo_(programming_language)
What it appears to me is that the following happened:
The originator of the delete request, Ramaksoud2000, is a fucking idiot that doesn't know anything. He recently got admin powers and it obviously went to his head.
A bunch of people show up in the discussion and say, no you stupid fuck, the Hugo article is fine.
Ramaksoud2000 can't handle it, argues with people (poorly, he was wrong about everything) and starts steaming because he's going to lose this one.
Ramaksoud2000, being a dumb fucking loser, also starts requesting "sock account investigations" but he's wrong about that, too. He is wrong about that because he is absolutely the dumbest and most worthless piece of shit on the Internet.
At the very end, another piece of human garbage, the user named "CZAR" claims ... I don't even know. "Canvassing" I guess he calls it. He does this 30 minutes before the decision is made by the "closer," because "CZAR" doesn't want there to actually be discussion because he's full of shit.
The "closer," whose account name is Jo-Jo Eumerus, is another fucking waste of space that sees a discussion with 6 people saying "keep it" and decides to delete/redirect.
So, IMO this is typical bureaucracy from Wikipedia. The people that spend all day on Wikipedia, like Ramaksoud2000, CZAR and the closer just tried to get over on the regular people with lives that actually know what they are talking about.
That is my take.
What is YOUR take. For the one time in the history of this BBS you don't need to limit or censor yourself. You know a lot about Wikipedia, I am interested in your opinion.