by Ben » Fri Aug 09, 2002 11:22 pm
Anyone like Memento? Let's talk some Memento!
Like, I just bought it today, and watched it for the second time -- what a nice movie! Always something to chew on, always finding/seeing/thinking new things as you go over it and over it... all this in under two hours!
But I'm a bit confused still about this whole "Sammy Jankis" story. I've spent the last 30 minutes or so on deja.com reading a ton of amateur analysis, which has given me a lot of different interpretations, but none of which are wholly satisfying. I think if the movie fails in any way, it's in this area, since I'm beginning to think that there are no satisfying interpretations, and thus the movie, which is so confident and rock-solid in all of its many intricacies, has misstepped in this one relatively straightforward facet.
But I'm not willing to give up yet. Anyone? Let's start with this question:
Is Teddy correct, in that Sammy's story is really Leonard's story?
Obviously, the movie makes us want to believe that, though it seems contradictory with other stuff, like:
If that's true, then how come Leonard doesn't remember his wife being a diabetic?
The best explanation for this interpretation (written by a guy at 7 AM eastern time on 9/11/01 -- spooky, huh?) is that in addition to (or perhaps instead of) Leonard's biological problem (the antereograde amnesia), he's also undergone a major psychological blow, including tons of denial and stuff like that.
That may be true, but I find that somewhat unsatisfying, given that his psychological state of mind has really not been the focus for the rest of the movie. It's set up to be a cool, perverse mindgame, solely based on Leonard's biological state -- and now we're supposed to also deal with mental problems as well? It seems to dilute the "purity" of the rest of the movie's path.
One alternative is that Teddy is just full of shit, but then there's little point to that entire scene.
It's about this point that I start getting a headache and give up.
But let's talk Memento!!
Anyone like Memento? Let's talk some Memento!
Like, I just bought it today, and watched it for the second time -- what a nice movie! Always something to chew on, always finding/seeing/thinking new things as you go over it and over it... all this in under two hours!
But I'm a bit confused still about this whole "Sammy Jankis" story. I've spent the last 30 minutes or so on deja.com reading a ton of amateur analysis, which has given me a lot of different interpretations, but none of which are wholly satisfying. I think if the movie fails in any way, it's in this area, since I'm beginning to think that there [i]are[/i] no satisfying interpretations, and thus the movie, which is so confident and rock-solid in all of its many intricacies, has misstepped in this one relatively straightforward facet.
But I'm not willing to give up yet. Anyone? Let's start with this question:
[b]Is Teddy correct, in that Sammy's story is really Leonard's story?[/b]
Obviously, the movie makes us want to believe that, though it seems contradictory with other stuff, like:
[b]If that's true, then how come Leonard doesn't remember his wife being a diabetic?[/b]
The best explanation for this interpretation (written by a guy at 7 AM eastern time on 9/11/01 -- spooky, huh?) is that in addition to (or perhaps instead of) Leonard's biological problem (the antereograde amnesia), he's also undergone a major psychological blow, including tons of denial and stuff like that.
That may be true, but I find that somewhat unsatisfying, given that his [i]psychological[/i] state of mind has really not been the focus for the rest of the movie. It's set up to be a cool, perverse mindgame, solely based on Leonard's [i]biological[/i] state -- and now we're supposed to also deal with mental problems as well? It seems to dilute the "purity" of the rest of the movie's path.
One alternative is that Teddy is just full of shit, but then there's little point to that entire scene.
It's about this point that I start getting a headache and give up.
But let's talk Memento!!