PLEASE READ

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:smile: :sad: :eek: :shock: :cool: :-x :razz: :oops: :evil: :twisted: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :mrgreen:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: PLEASE READ

by Lex » Fri May 28, 2004 3:48 pm

You got SERVED!

by Worm » Fri May 28, 2004 2:43 pm

OH DIS

by bruce » Fri May 28, 2004 1:22 pm

Da King wrote: I think that anyone who uses "ITYM" is a bigger tard.
I think that if I wanted any comeback from you I'd scrape it off your tonsils.

Bruce

by Da King » Thu May 27, 2004 8:17 pm

bruce wrote:
AArdvark wrote: You know that elvis song.. 'You are always on my mind'?
ITYM "Willie Nelson". Tard.
I think that anyone who uses "ITYM" is a bigger tard.

by AArdvark » Sat May 22, 2004 6:26 pm

Two letters...

F



U


I say Elvis sang it, so there......


Anyone else that sang it (or even WROTE it) can go suck your popsickle

GRRRRRRRRRR

by bruce » Fri May 21, 2004 9:20 pm

AArdvark wrote: You know that elvis song.. 'You are always on my mind'?
ITYM "Willie Nelson". Tard.
Now I have to do something outrageous...
Like get Willie and Elvis confused?

Bruce

by AArdvark » Fri May 21, 2004 7:04 pm

oh suuuure, the Vark dosen't even make the list.

You know that elvis song.. 'You are always on my mind'?

Does not apply here..

Now I have to do something outrageous...



THE
LOOK OUT!
AARDVARK

by Da King » Fri May 21, 2004 6:51 pm

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:The SPIRIT of the comment (nobody comes here) is inarguable, so I was attempting to negate it on a strict technicality.
WITH TEH GAY!??!

by Mother of God » Thu May 20, 2004 10:17 am

Yeah, I hear yah, quitcher bitchin'.

by Vitriola » Wed May 19, 2004 4:49 pm

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:Jesus, you could mince the gay in here and put it in a pie. I was just listing the first people who came to mind in order to get to double digits. The SPIRIT of the comment (nobody comes here) is inarguable, so I was attempting to negate it on a strict technicality.
Yeah, you don't hear me bitching about how I was #6, do you? Does anyone hear that? DOES ANYONE EVEN HEAR ME? AT ALL? HELLO?!?

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Wed May 19, 2004 8:21 am

Jesus, you could mince the gay in here and put it in a pie. I was just listing the first people who came to mind in order to get to double digits. The SPIRIT of the comment (nobody comes here) is inarguable, so I was attempting to negate it on a strict technicality.

by danzaland » Wed May 19, 2004 5:34 am

Lex's Gay, Broken Heart wrote:I am 2? :(
Actually... "number two"

by danzaland » Wed May 19, 2004 5:34 am

Alas I did not create the original post because A) it is clever and B) it would require sometime to write that and I just don't have that much while I fight the New World Order.

by Lex's Gay, Broken Heart » Wed May 19, 2004 12:51 am

I am 2? :(

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Tue May 18, 2004 7:57 pm

I only went to ten. I could have gone as high as TWENTY!!

Da King, you may be #18 on the JC top posters list, but you'll always be #1 in my gay, throbbing, beating heart.

by Da King » Tue May 18, 2004 7:47 pm

At least you made the list. :(

by Lex's still-beating heart » Tue May 18, 2004 3:01 pm

I am 8?

:(

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Tue May 18, 2004 2:00 pm

Reality Check wrote:In reality, the number of people visiting this site regularly don't number in the double digits.
1. ICJ
2. Knuckles
3. Worm
4. Lysander
5. Straw
6. Vitriola
7. Gerrit
8. Lex
9. Casual Observer

NUMBER TEN BRUCIE!!! Ha-HA!!!

by Reality Check » Tue May 18, 2004 1:51 pm

Robert Jenkins wrote: Boring Drivel.
-RJ
I needent point out that there is no "concerned" parent that is fighting against the evil JoltCountry forum. In reality, the number of people visiting this site regularly don't number in the double digits so nobody cares enough to really get upset. Just as pathetic as trolls are those who waste valuable time responding to trolls or reading such posts.

by Robert Jenkins » Tue May 18, 2004 12:49 pm

Okay, lets back up here. You are upset because your children are reading this website. First and foremost, let me make something clear -- no five-year old needs to be mindlessly surfing the internet. And why may I ask are you so concerned about your children reading this website while on the internet? I would personally be much more concerned about my son seeing the photographs of soldiers torturing Iraqi prisoners or the video of the al-Qaida decapitating an American citizen. But, never the less, if you are so concerned with what your children are seeing then you need to be the one monitering their usage, not complaining to people you have never seen before to hold back thier feelings.

Also, why don't you take a moment to actually look at what you are doing. Rather than spending quality time with your children you are on the internet slanderizing people's writing. Now I am almost 100% certain that your kids are probably parked in front of the television or a video game while you are doing this, the same way they are in front of the computer when you are out. Why don't you consider actually being a parent to your children. Rather than wasting time on this website, you could be with your kids reading a book, going swimming, playing in the park, but no, instead your kids are off doing Lord knows what while you sit on the internet trying your best to make sure that everything your kids see is lollipops and bubblegum.

There is so much wrong with this situation I don't even know where to take it. Let's say you do shut down Jolt Country. What about all the other wicked sites? What about the pornographic websites? You gonna shut down everything on the internet that you find that is not peachy? There is always going to be something out there that someone objects to. Just deal with it. Live with it. People have a right to say what they want, where they want, when they want. "Ice Cream Jonsey" does NOT have you in mind when he is writing, I can guarantee.

Just do me a favor and be a parent to your children. Don't hide and shelter them from the world, I promise you that it will not have good results. Perhaps if you had been doing your job in the first place, rather than shoving your kids in front of a screen to keep them away from you for five minutes, this would not be an issue. By the way, I am also a parent.


-RJ

Top