by Worm » Mon Jul 19, 2004 4:24 pm
Casual Observer wrote:Worm wrote:I just haven't been sitting her getting e-mail reminders for each reply to one of my posts and slamming my refresh key.
Of course, you did respond to me after a mere 6 minutes this time.
Wow, I didn't think you'd reply with a Xerox of what I thought you would post. I am the computer thusly my speedy reply. When it was a day, I was away from the computer and missed your post. Do we even need to go over this?
Casual Observer wrote:Worm wrote: There is no excuse for accepting I.Q. as a true measure of intelligence, either.
Ouch, I guess my insult must have had even more truth to it than I realized. Sorry to hurt your feelings.
What insult? "UR DUMB"? I'm going to type this once. Just because a test has the word "Intelligence" in the initialism for it doesn't mean it represents that whatsoever. I know that's a hell of a hurdle to jump, it does indeed promise a quotient of the person's intelligence, though sadly it's not that easy. Just don't dress up posts where you're calling me dumb with mention of some method of testing intelligence that only idiots really believe does anything but test a persons ability to take an I.Q. test. You're not a smart person, not an interesting person, not at least on this board.
There are people here who are funnier, smarter, and just better people than you. I don't know how I'd perceive you if I had actually met you but your ability to use this message board to communicate and represent yourself is pathetic. So really, head down to Gamefaqs or some other little RPG board if you want to post, just don't post here where you're going to be constantly dwarfed by people who have this whole "Bulletin Board System" shit down.
[quote="Casual Observer"][quote="Worm"]I just haven't been sitting her getting e-mail reminders for each reply to one of my posts and slamming my refresh key.[/quote]
Of course, you did respond to me after a mere 6 minutes this time.[/quote]
Wow, I didn't think you'd reply with a Xerox of what I thought you would post. I am the computer thusly my speedy reply. When it was a day, I was away from the computer and missed your post. Do we even need to go over this?
[quote="Casual Observer"][quote="Worm"] There is no excuse for accepting I.Q. as a true measure of intelligence, either.
[/quote]
Ouch, I guess my insult must have had even more truth to it than I realized. Sorry to hurt your feelings.[/quote]
What insult? "UR DUMB"? I'm going to type this once. Just because a test has the word "Intelligence" in the initialism for it doesn't mean it represents that whatsoever. I know that's a hell of a hurdle to jump, it does indeed promise a quotient of the person's intelligence, though sadly it's not that easy. Just don't dress up posts where you're calling me dumb with mention of some method of testing intelligence that only idiots really believe does anything but test a persons ability to take an I.Q. test. You're not a smart person, not an interesting person, not at least on this board.
There are people here who are funnier, smarter, and just better people than you. I don't know how I'd perceive you if I had actually met you but your ability to use this message board to communicate and represent yourself is pathetic. So really, head down to Gamefaqs or some other little RPG board if you want to post, just don't post here where you're going to be constantly dwarfed by people who have this whole "Bulletin Board System" shit down.