by Ice Cream Jonsey » Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:20 pm
Also, this place will have a better template, going forward. This Banzai Bug shit is not supposed to be funny or hilarious in 2008 - I changed the default phpBB graphic years ago, and trying to navigate phpBB's directory system is a losing proposition! (Please note: the Banzai Bug theme aspired for greatness in 2003.)
Pinback from Branch, CA asked about what kind of post is considered threadshitting, and which isn't. It's sort of like what they say about obsenity. Normally, you know it when you see it and when it is obscene, it usually makes Worm's dick hard. Unfortunately, we don't have access to a webcam pointed at Worm's crotch. So let's go with this:
1) If the post was written anonymously, in about four seconds, and it is attacking someone here, it's probably not written with an aspiration for greatness. In fact, it was probably written with the direct opposite in mind. Therefore it is SHIT.
2) Actually, we can amend it to, if the post is anonymous and attacking Pinback, it's probably unfunny SHIT.
3) The exception to all this would be an anonymous attack that is poorly written by someone's wall-eyed ex-lover from five years ago that makes the originator come off like either a child molestor or serial murderer. But surely that's a corner case that we'd never see here, ha ha! Wow, just wow.
I hope this helps, for a little bit.
Also, this place will have a better template, going forward. This Banzai Bug shit is not supposed to be funny or hilarious in 2008 - I changed the default phpBB graphic years ago, and trying to navigate phpBB's directory system is a losing proposition! (Please note: the Banzai Bug theme [i]aspired for greatness[/i] in 2003.)
Pinback from Branch, CA asked about what kind of post is considered threadshitting, and which isn't. It's sort of like what they say about obsenity. Normally, you know it when you see it and when it is obscene, it usually makes Worm's dick hard. Unfortunately, we don't have access to a webcam pointed at Worm's crotch. So let's go with this:
1) If the post was written anonymously, in about four seconds, and it is attacking someone here, it's probably not written with an [i]aspiration for greatness[/i]. In fact, it was probably written with the direct opposite in mind. Therefore it is SHIT.
2) Actually, we can amend it to, if the post is anonymous and attacking Pinback, it's probably unfunny SHIT.
3) The exception to all this would be an anonymous attack that is poorly written by someone's wall-eyed ex-lover from five years ago that makes the originator come off like either a child molestor or serial murderer. But surely that's a corner case that we'd never see here, ha ha! Wow, just wow.
I hope this helps, for a little bit.