by Flack » Sun May 23, 2010 4:57 pm
You know, I'm kind of the same way. My earliest memories of Pac-Man weren't from the arcades, but from the computer. In the early 80s we had the TRS-80 and the Apple II, both of which had multiple Pac-Clones. Then we got the Atari 2600 version of Pac-Man, and I just don't remember it being as bad as people say it was. I mean, I can look at it now and, gosh, it looks terrible when compared to the arcade version, but as a kid it seemed okay to me -- especially since there wasn't a Pac-Man machine within walking distance to my house ... so yeah, the Atari version was better than not playing it at all!
[youtube][/youtube]
Apple II Version
[youtube][/youtube]
Commodore 64 Version
[youtube][/youtube]
Atari 2600 Version
[youtube][/youtube]
You can do it. You can do the Pac-Man.
You know, I'm kind of the same way. My earliest memories of Pac-Man weren't from the arcades, but from the computer. In the early 80s we had the TRS-80 and the Apple II, both of which had multiple Pac-Clones. Then we got the Atari 2600 version of Pac-Man, and I just don't remember it being as bad as people say it was. I mean, I can look at it now and, gosh, it looks terrible when compared to the arcade version, but as a kid it seemed okay to me -- especially since there wasn't a Pac-Man machine within walking distance to my house ... so yeah, the Atari version was better than not playing it at all!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JEG1TttkBo[/youtube]
Apple II Version
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_HCeK6prYc[/youtube]
Commodore 64 Version
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HL2p2ANFlQ4[/youtube]
Atari 2600 Version
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jQkBiU_2rg[/youtube]
You can do it. You can do the Pac-Man.