by Finsternis » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:26 pm
If it was indeed a stunt (and I have a theory that it might in fact have been a technical or financial glitch that they're trying to cover up) it wasn't the best idea. i don't think they've hurt themselves seriously, but even if it was a pre-arranged PR gag to get free publicity, I don't think it was a good idea overall. I'm not pissed off, but if I had been in charge I wouldn't have run with it. It's true they do sell virtual products, but since there's no DRM, as long as you have your copy downloaded and safe on your hard drive if they go out of business it doesn't hurt your ability play games you've bought.
I think "I'll never give them a cent" might be a bit of an overreaction - they still sell great games for real cheap, and they're yours forever no matter what happens. But yes, I can see how people might have gotten upset.
If it was indeed a stunt (and I have a theory that it might in fact have been a technical or financial glitch that they're trying to cover up) it wasn't the best idea. i don't think they've hurt themselves seriously, but even if it was a pre-arranged PR gag to get free publicity, I don't think it was a good idea overall. I'm not pissed off, but if I had been in charge I wouldn't have run with it. It's true they do sell virtual products, but since there's no DRM, as long as you have your copy downloaded and safe on your hard drive if they go out of business it doesn't hurt your ability play games you've bought.
I think "I'll never give them a cent" might be a bit of an overreaction - they still sell great games for real cheap, and they're yours forever no matter what happens. But yes, I can see how people might have gotten upset.