Ben wrote:Hey, pal. I know we both went into this with the best of intentions, but if you take a look at the contract, it does state "this contract may be nullified by either party for any reason at any time", the so-called "umbrella clause".
Did you add that in? You added that in, didn't you? Roody told me to send the contact to you as a PDF and not a .DOC file... (checking...) unbelievable. Well, you're right. I hope it feels satisfying, taking advantage of a novice to such contracts and legal matters in this way. My legal experience is limited to filling out some Turbo Tax forms, and playing through the Jerry Orbach scenes in the "Law & Order" computer game. Yours apparently involve the delicate transfer of third-party souls to Mephistopheles, Prince of Lies.
If you dispute this, please call me off-line, because I do not care to get into this in front of your audience.
I did call you. When did you get a secretary? When did you start "screening" your calls?
And although it was outside the scope of the current contract, I should hasten to point out the other content I have brought you, free of charge and royalty, in the form of MP3's and WAV files filled with original music. That has no bearing on this discussion, but it DOES have a bearing on the discussion of whether the contract had been entered into in good faith or as some sort of scheme (which I do not think you are implying, but I am not sure.)
But surely this was done
pro bono? Gerrit has donated a song for the upcoming endeavour, and he has not requests any further financial or social considerations or compensation!
We have been through a lot together, particularly on this website, and I would hate for this to have to come to an end. Your audience might feel differently, but I am fairly certain that you do not. Therefore I implore you to rethink your recent statements and course of action, and see if we might resolve this in a less contentious manner.
Indeed. I think we both want the same thing. For:
1) You do not be a such an angry (and angered) prick. Except towards the Scottish kids, as noted in the original contract.
2) For you to fulfill the character-based content terms of our original agreement, as per our... er, original agreement.
3) For Monto Rusa to reach its stated goal of 98% uptime, so that the larger "Pinback's Web Central, Jolt Country, Monto Rusa" Conglomerate Family of Independent Websites can continue to bring only the highest quality content for years to come.
4) No hitting in the face
I request this with the utmost of respect. But I will not allow myself to be the Woz to your Steve Jobs, sir.
[quote="Ben"]Hey, pal. I know we both went into this with the best of intentions, but if you take a look at the contract, it [i]does[/i] state "this contract may be nullified by either party for any reason at any time", the so-called "umbrella clause". [/quote]
Did you add that in? You added that in, didn't you? Roody told me to send the contact to you as a PDF and not a .DOC file... (checking...) unbelievable. Well, you're right. I hope it feels satisfying, taking advantage of a novice to such contracts and legal matters in this way. My legal experience is limited to filling out some Turbo Tax forms, and playing through the Jerry Orbach scenes in the "Law & Order" computer game. Yours apparently involve the delicate transfer of third-party souls to Mephistopheles, Prince of Lies.
[quote]If you dispute this, please call me off-line, because I do not care to get into this in front of your audience.[/quote]
I did call you. When did you get a secretary? When did you start "screening" your calls?
[quote]And although it was outside the scope of the current contract, I should hasten to point out the other content I have brought you, free of charge and royalty, in the form of MP3's and WAV files filled with original music. That has no bearing on this discussion, but it DOES have a bearing on the discussion of whether the contract had been entered into in good faith or as some sort of scheme (which I do not think you are implying, but I am not sure.)[/quote]
But surely this was done [i]pro bono?[/i] Gerrit has donated a song for the upcoming endeavour, and he has not requests any further financial or social considerations or compensation!
[quote]We have been through a lot together, particularly on this website, and I would hate for this to have to come to an end. Your audience might feel differently, but I am fairly certain that you do not. Therefore I implore you to rethink your recent statements and course of action, and see if we might resolve this in a less contentious manner.[/quote]
Indeed. I think we both want the same thing. For:
1) You do not be a such an angry (and angered) prick. Except towards the Scottish kids, as noted in the original contract.
2) For you to fulfill the character-based content terms of our original agreement, as per our... er, original agreement.
3) For Monto Rusa to reach its stated goal of 98% uptime, so that the larger "Pinback's Web Central, Jolt Country, Monto Rusa" Conglomerate Family of Independent Websites can continue to bring only the highest quality content for years to come.
4) No hitting in the face
I request this with the utmost of respect. But I will not allow myself to be the Woz to your Steve Jobs, sir.