by Tdarcos » Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:18 am
Tdarcos wrote:Flack wrote:It wouldn't matter. Those spam attacks come from scripts, not people. All you would end up with would be a bunch of spammy posts full of non-working links.
You didn't listen. I said "prohibit posts," meaning if the post has a link, it's rejected; the script won't recognize this and is defeated.
And I realize that the way I phrased it could have meant to refuse to translate a
link leaving it as text as opposed to rejecting the post altogether, my apologies for the misunderstanding. The idea is to stop scripted attacks.
Another possibility is to require captcha on non-registered users and registered users whose accounts are aged less than 7 days. Wikipedia does this with "semi-protected" pages; you have to have a registered account and it has to have been around more than 4 days. This chases off the typical spammers who want fast quick-hit results.
I still think the answer is to back-track and follow the money, draining the swamp will kill the alligators, err I mean stopping the money would get rid of most of the spam. That, and what Jonsey did, tracking down where the spam comes from and neutralizing their servers, either by shutting down the botnets, blocking known spam generating addresses or domains, closing down the spam hosts in the case of e-mail spam servers, and stopping credit card charges to spam merchants.
[quote="Tdarcos"][quote="Flack"]It wouldn't matter. Those spam attacks come from scripts, not people. All you would end up with would be a bunch of spammy posts full of non-working links.[/quote]
You didn't listen. I said "prohibit posts," meaning if the post has a link, it's rejected; the script won't recognize this and is defeated.[/quote]
And I realize that the way I phrased it could have meant to refuse to translate a [i]link[/i] leaving it as text as opposed to rejecting the post altogether, my apologies for the misunderstanding. The idea is to stop scripted attacks.
Another possibility is to require captcha on non-registered users and registered users whose accounts are aged less than 7 days. Wikipedia does this with "semi-protected" pages; you have to have a registered account and it has to have been around more than 4 days. This chases off the typical spammers who want fast quick-hit results.
I still think the answer is to back-track and follow the money, draining the swamp will kill the alligators, err I mean stopping the money would get rid of most of the spam. That, and what Jonsey did, tracking down where the spam comes from and neutralizing their servers, either by shutting down the botnets, blocking known spam generating addresses or domains, closing down the spam hosts in the case of e-mail spam servers, and stopping credit card charges to spam merchants.