IS THE MODERATOR GOING TO DO HIS JOB?

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:smile: :sad: :eek: :shock: :cool: :-x :razz: :oops: :evil: :twisted: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :mrgreen:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: IS THE MODERATOR GOING TO DO HIS JOB?

by nessman » Sat Apr 12, 2003 7:24 pm

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:Is there anybody else seeing light gray text on white for the message input box?
Yup - I am... IE v5.0

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Sat Apr 12, 2003 11:29 am

It should be light gray on very dark grey.

Is there anybody else seeing light gray text on white for the message input box?

by chris » Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:33 pm

Base Monitor wrote:OKAY BUT LETS SAY YOU ARE THE MANAGER OF A BASEBALL TEAM AND YOU ASSIGN A NEW GUY TO BE IN LEFT FIELD. AND PEOPLE KEEP HITTING BALLS TO LEFT FIELD AND HE CONTINUES TO MISJUDGE BOBBLE DROP OR EVEN JUST IGNORE THE BALLS ARE YOU GOING TO LEAVE HIM IN THE BALLGAME?
No, I'd ask Mr. Knoblauch to sit down. :smile:

And why is the text light grey on white when I type something in?

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Fri Apr 11, 2003 6:27 pm

Base Monitor wrote:I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THE MODERATOR HAS NOT ONLY NOT BEEN MODERATING BUT HE HAS NOT EVEN PUT THE EFFORT IN TO VISIT THIS BASE ON A REGULAR BASIS ON COMMENT ON THESE PROCEEDINGS.

n/t
Look, for all I know you are him.

I was thinking of making a base where we really thrash out the major issues plaguing society. One per week, all topics locked after a week. The "winner" is determined by not the beauty of the argument, but by the amount of effort expunged by a single side. Gimmicks, trolls and Photoshops would all contribute to this as well.

But, we'd need a moderator. And it would require a lot more effort than I can give --

Wait, why the fuck am I talking to you?! You're not even real!

n/t

by Base Monitor » Fri Apr 11, 2003 6:10 pm

HEY IT IS NO SKIN OFF MY NOSE IF YOU ARE DETERMINED TO LET THIS PLACE GO DOWNHILL BY ENTRUSTING IT TO THE CARE OF APPARENTLY UNDEDICATED UNPROFESSIONAL MODERATORS.

I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THE MODERATOR HAS NOT ONLY NOT BEEN MODERATING BUT HE HAS NOT EVEN PUT THE EFFORT IN TO VISIT THIS BASE ON A REGULAR BASIS ON COMMENT ON THESE PROCEEDINGS.

n/t

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Fri Apr 11, 2003 3:58 pm

First of all, Nessman knows that I would not really ban him. I have known him for years, for Christ's sake.

Secondly, no, I would not change the left fielder in your example. What I would do is get my radio set to the talk radio stations, tap into their systems, and then run a reverse lookup for everyone who blasted my left fielder. Why would I do this? Because the left fielder in question has brought more COMEDY - I mean, is such a great batter - that his suspect fielding doesn't matter. So I would instead beat the shit out of all the callers who are asking for his head.

Sort of like how you are.

by Base Monitor » Fri Apr 11, 2003 3:50 pm

OKAY BUT LETS SAY YOU ARE THE MANAGER OF A BASEBALL TEAM AND YOU ASSIGN A NEW GUY TO BE IN LEFT FIELD. AND PEOPLE KEEP HITTING BALLS TO LEFT FIELD AND HE CONTINUES TO MISJUDGE BOBBLE DROP OR EVEN JUST IGNORE THE BALLS ARE YOU GOING TO LEAVE HIM IN THE BALLGAME?

THAT LEFT FIELDER IS THE MODERATOR OF THIS BASE AND THIS BASE IS THE BALLGAME AND HE IS HURTING YOUR TEAM WITH HIS NEGLECTFUL BEHAVIOR.

n/t

by nessman » Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:14 am

Acknowledged. Out.

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:13 am

Edited to add: don't start with me, BM.

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:13 am

I know you're just being a dick to get me riled up, but do be aware that there is an active and vibrant community installed here and they expect to be able to browse 10 of the 11 bases (or however many there are) without surprises like, say, some bitch stuffing her entire hand down her gash.

by Base Monitor » Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:11 am

PERHAPS IF THE BASE MODERATOR WAS DOING HIS JOB THIS SORT OF THING WOULDNT HAPPEN.

n/t

by nessman » Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:10 am

Hee hee hee!!

:twisted:

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:04 am

Hey!

Asshole!

Post that again and I WILL ban you. Obviously I don't care what goes on in the Troll Room, but if you're going to turn my BBS into something that's not work safe and you think I am going to follow you around and hee hee hee after this shit like Jeff does then fucking think again.

by nessman » Fri Apr 11, 2003 6:58 am

CENSORED!

by Guest » Sat Apr 05, 2003 1:02 pm

Take board moderation and stick it up your ass bitch!

http://www.nessman.net/handyass.jpg


Don't be an asshole, you fucking cunt, Ness. Jesus Fucking Christ.

by Debaser » Tue Apr 01, 2003 2:06 am

How about:

In that hit mid-century epic of pre-Nirvana angst known as The Catcher in the Rye, whiny ant-ihero Holden Caulfield insisted that most everyone he met was phony. Turns out he was right.

D&D games are generally improved by the inclusion of humongous minotaur phalli.

Todd McFarlane is a deeply disturbed individual, but no more so than the rest of us in all likelihood.

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Tue Apr 01, 2003 12:01 am

AArdvark wrote:
"Hello, my name is Norman Nermal. I am having problems with my computer..."

"Tell your girlfriend not to talk with her mouth full!"

"Don't chew your nails, either!"

"Make sure your boss pays you on a regular basis!"
We should start a topic (or actually, append to this one) the "Top 5 Things I Learned From Jolt Country." Certainly those three. But also:

"Ernie Els is a joke. Like a leaky colostomy bag that everyone notices except the owner."

"The only thing worse than a cold war with a bunch of Russians is living with them."

"The single mitigating factor in determining whether anyone will like you on the Internet is whether or not you use capital letters, periods, and words that make up a questioning statement rather than just '???'."

by AArdvark » Mon Mar 31, 2003 7:51 pm

Just what does a Base moderator DO anyway?

After all, Arent we all base moderators deep inside?



THE
FORTUNE COOKIE
AARDVARK

by Forum Buddhist » Mon Mar 31, 2003 7:48 pm

He moderates by not moderating. Moderating is something that should be done only in moderation.

by base patron » Mon Mar 31, 2003 7:45 pm

i guess that means that at least the base monitor is doing his job, right?

Top