I am going to see what happens

by **Quinn Z. DeAngelo** » Wed May 08, 2013 1:42 am

Tdarcos wrote: In view of the commentary from others, I'm withdrawing my statement I was not going to post (which is why I have marked the original in strike out.) I am going to see instead if I can stay in the rules. I guess I owe it to my fans.

Hey fella, you know, bullshit floats in water, and it sure looks like that's what you're dispensing. Nobody wanted to read the crap you wrote, anyway, and once all the sewage backed up into their throats, they probably were glad to hear you got kicked off.

Fact remains, anyway, guy, this was pure bullshit, you'da found some reason to change your mind and come back. At least that Beastly SvSoviet adminisasshole guy is consistently a prick, which makes him kinda entertaining in, you know, a strange way. You tend to just be consistently boring. Maybe you think the shit you spew don't stink, doesn't mean other people like the smell.

by **Quinn Z. DeAngelo** » Wed May 08, 2013 1:23 am

Bradley Svedka. wrote:
Tdarcos wrote:
Bradley Svedka. wrote:Violation. Deleting post through strike tag. 2 demerits, User account: Tdarcos. 20130507.

Warning, user account codex ident Tdarcos. User is close to mandatory five-day ban.
Two simple questions to repeat what I asked before. What represents conduct subject to demerit, i.e. how is one to know what is or isn't acceptable?
Repeated post. Violation. 3 demerits. User account Tdarcos. 20130507.

Tdarcos: five day ban starting at 5/8/13 00:01 AM PDT.

Tdarcos: new record for demerits in a single day.

Hey fella, the poor guy just wants to know how not to get thrown off. Being an insufferable prick and lying about it doesn't make you a good administrator, it just makes you an insufferable prick and people will start to think he's right.

by **Tdarcos** » Tue May 07, 2013 8:54 pm

Bradley Svedka.. wrote:True. 2 demerits removed, user account Tdarcos. 20230507.

Uh, you're removing them effective in ten years? This is 2013, not 2023.

VIOLATION: Bradley Svedka, wrong date on post, 6 demerits 05/07/2013. Total count is 24.

by **Bradley Svedka..** » Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm

True. 2 demerits removed, user account Tdarcos. 20230507.

by **Tdarcos** » Tue May 07, 2013 4:43 pm

Bradley Svedka. wrote:Repeated post. Violation. 3 demerits. User account Tdarcos. 20130507.

Tdarcos: five day ban starting at 5/8/13 00:01 AM PDT.

Tdarcos: new record for demerits in a single day.

When did I repeat anything? And you still haven't answered my question you hypocritical son-of-a-bitch!

I don't have to be nice any more since you've decided to target me anyway. You never had any intention of being reasonable or fair, you just wanted to be petty and mean.

by **Bradley Svedka.** » Tue May 07, 2013 4:13 pm

Tdarcos wrote:
Bradley Svedka. wrote:Violation. Deleting post through strike tag. 2 demerits, User account: Tdarcos. 20130507.

Warning, user account codex ident Tdarcos. User is close to mandatory five-day ban.
Two simple questions to repeat what I asked before. What represents conduct subject to demerit, i.e. how is one to know what is or isn't acceptable?

Repeated post. Violation. 3 demerits. User account Tdarcos. 20130507.

Tdarcos: five day ban starting at 5/8/13 00:01 AM PDT.

Tdarcos: new record for demerits in a single day.

by **Tdarcos** » Tue May 07, 2013 3:52 pm

Bradley Svedka. wrote:Violation. Deleting post through strike tag. 2 demerits, User account: Tdarcos. 20130507.

Warning, user account codex ident Tdarcos. User is close to mandatory five-day ban.

Two simple questions to repeat what I asked before. What represents conduct subject to demerit, i.e. how is one to know what is or isn't acceptable?

by **Bradley Svedka.** » Tue May 07, 2013 3:49 pm

Violation. Deleting post through strike tag. 2 demerits, User account: Tdarcos. 20130507.

Warning, user account codex ident Tdarcos. User is close to mandatory five-day ban.

by **Tdarcos** » Tue May 07, 2013 3:22 pm

Ham sandwich wrote: For Paul, it is the least I can do.

Your reference to Fleetwood Mac's "Sara" is touching. But first, I had better get a reference to what Bradley Svedka is doing because I have no idea what he means. I may get demerits simply for referencing him in the third person, you never know.

Lindsey Buckingham wrote:As you listen, I too would ask you substitute the name Sara with Paul. Thanks in advance!
~Lindsey

In view of the commentary from others, I'm withdrawing my statement I was not going to post (which is why I have marked the original in strike out.) I am going to see instead if I can stay in the rules. I guess I owe it to my fans.

by **Lindsey Buckingham** » Tue May 07, 2013 3:20 pm

As you listen, I too would ask you substitute the name Sara with Paul. Thanks in advance!
~Lindsey

by **Ham sandwich** » Tue May 07, 2013 3:17 pm

This song makes me think of the times we have had. The post you have made. The suppers we have had together over your cooking videos. This Paul is my dedication to you. I would sail the seas of cheese to see you post again. You my friend put the show in the Don Rogers Show. You my friend are the one who blew my headphones up. And that I like. I like you Paul. Come back!

For Paul, it is the least I can do.

by **Tdarcos** » Tue May 07, 2013 2:14 pm

Apparently I can't do it right and don't know what I'm doing wrong. <s>So, I've decided on two things. I'm not going to claim I'm leaving, but I'm thinking I'll stop posting since no matter what I do it's always wrong. </s>

<s>And they're too much work, and since I'm about to be punished for my mistake, I will not give rewards in return. I shall do cooking videos, no longer. Thank you, Jonsey, for deciding you want me to stop.</s>
This message is cancelled; see below.

I am going to see what happens

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: I am going to see what happens

Re: Dedicated to Paul

Re: Dedicated to Paul

Dedicated to Paul

I am going to see what happens