Tdarcos wrote:I tried reading it. Do you think you could have made the font smaller so It'd be impossible to read instead of merely causing migraines and hysterical blindness?
Literally nobody else in the world has a problem with the font size, you aged, peeling walrus.
Lode runner was "the gold standard" in testing IBM-PC compatibility. Like many games, it was a self-loader, i.e. it had its own operating system. And if Lode Runner would run on a computer it pretty much guaranteed it was PC compatible; a lot of clones weren't.
I have no idea what this even means. You have no idea what this evens means. If a program was the "gold standard" for IBM's selected chipsets, then it would simply boot and call all the necessary interrupts in order and then print a message when it got to the end.
What you seem to be saying is that if a clone ran Lode Runner, it would run anything else and that's patently untrue because the PCjr ran Lode Runner and didn't run every other single program for the IBM PC.
If I take your statement a different way and you say that if a clone couldn't run Lode Runner it wasn't worth getting then I also disagree with that, because - going back to the PCjr - it ran Lode Runner, it couldn't run a lot of software like Spy Hunter, but it had 16 colors for King's Quest. So presuming that's what you meant, it also makes no sense.
Are you trying to say that Lode Runner ran on all clones? In that case, wouldn't it follow that it was the LEAST restrictive software product? I don't think even you know.
[quote="Tdarcos"]I tried reading it. Do you think you could have made the font smaller so It'd be impossible to read instead of merely causing migraines and hysterical blindness?[/quote]
Literally nobody else in the world has a problem with the font size, you aged, peeling walrus.
[quote]Lode runner was "the gold standard" in testing IBM-PC compatibility. Like many games, it was a self-loader, i.e. it had its own operating system. And if Lode Runner would run on a computer it pretty much guaranteed it was PC compatible; a lot of clones weren't.[/quote]
I have no idea what this even means. You have no idea what this evens means. If a program was the "gold standard" for IBM's selected chipsets, then it would simply boot and call all the necessary interrupts in order and then print a message when it got to the end.
What you seem to be saying is that if a clone ran Lode Runner, it would run anything else and that's patently untrue because the PCjr ran Lode Runner and didn't run every other single program for the IBM PC.
If I take your statement a different way and you say that if a clone couldn't run Lode Runner it wasn't worth getting then I also disagree with that, because - going back to the PCjr - it ran Lode Runner, it couldn't run a lot of software like Spy Hunter, but it had 16 colors for King's Quest. So presuming that's what you meant, it also makes no sense.
Are you trying to say that Lode Runner ran on all clones? In that case, wouldn't it follow that it was the LEAST restrictive software product? I don't think even you know.