Hey Jiz, let's get some Retro updates in here.

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:smile: :sad: :eek: :shock: :cool: :-x :razz: :oops: :evil: :twisted: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :mrgreen:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Hey Jiz, let's get some Retro updates in here.

Re: Hey Jiz, let's get some Retro updates in here.

by pinback » Thu Sep 08, 2016 7:27 pm

Jizaboz wrote:We are beings having consciousness and do have the capacity to perceive time and the passing thereof of ourselves through it.
I disagree, but let's focus on Retro here.

by AArdvark » Thu Sep 08, 2016 5:09 pm

Re: Hey Jiz, let's get some Retro updates in here.

by Jizaboz » Thu Sep 08, 2016 3:30 pm

We are beings having consciousness and do have the capacity to perceive time and the passing thereof of ourselves through it.

In a highly technical and theoretical sense you may, to some extent be partially correct, however in the real world we often simplify concepts and some people do it without realizing it. And as a reasonably educated person you should know this. What the usual person means when they refer to "time" is not the concept of the fourth dimension, but the measurement of time conducted either as "duration" or "interval."

A "point in time" is an identification of a specific reference to the end of an interval expressed in hours, minutes and seconds from the zero value at the last occurrence of the event identified by the name "midnight," where the clock is presumed to reset all values less than a day to the value zero.

Time is a relative concept, for most of us, expressed as the interval or duration since the last event of midnight for the region we live in, or, if they choose, the local time at Greenwich, England, which is known as Universal Coordinated Time.[/quote]

Agreed.

by RetroRomper » Thu Sep 08, 2016 1:09 am

I swear to god, even if it kills me, I am going to outlive that motherfucker.

Re: Hey Jiz, let's get some Retro updates in here.

by Tdarcos » Mon Sep 05, 2016 3:01 pm

pinback wrote:(The phrase "point in time" is both redundant and nonsensical,
It is neither. It is a reasonable concept and has a well-known and established meaning.
pinback wrote:since time is a mental construct only, and does not exist -- there are no "points in time", as there is no continuum of time in which there could exist any individual points.
Wrong.
pinback wrote:There is only the timeless now, ever-changing, ever-still, whole and inseparable.)
We are beings having consciousness and do have the capacity to perceive time and the passing thereof of ourselves through it.

In a highly technical and theoretical sense you may, to some extent be partially correct, however in the real world we often simplify concepts and some people do it without realizing it. And as a reasonably educated person you should know this. What the usual person means when they refer to "time" is not the concept of the fourth dimension, but the measurement of time conducted either as "duration" or "interval."

A "point in time" is an identification of a specific reference to the end of an interval expressed in hours, minutes and seconds from the zero value at the last occurrence of the event identified by the name "midnight," where the clock is presumed to reset all values less than a day to the value zero.

Time is a relative concept, for most of us, expressed as the interval or duration since the last event of midnight for the region we live in, or, if they choose, the local time at Greenwich, England, which is known as Universal Coordinated Time.

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Sun Aug 28, 2016 2:11 am

I genuinely like RetroRomper.

by pinback » Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:07 pm

RetroRomper wrote:I suspect my screen name appears on pinback's friends list every day...
What is your "screen name"?

by RetroRomper » Fri Aug 26, 2016 3:41 pm

I suspect my screen name appears on pinback's friends list every day...

by Jizaboz » Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:20 am

by Jizaboz » Wed Aug 24, 2016 11:30 am

Damnit, that's for Paul's thread. Someone delete that last shit above.

by Jizaboz » Wed Aug 24, 2016 11:30 am

OK so current status:

He changed hospitals to see a heart specialist/surgeon. However, in the meantime they've had to run some tests to see what sort of anesthesia they should be using. The results of those tests could take up to another 2 weeks.

by Jizaboz » Wed Aug 24, 2016 11:20 am

I don't really have any way of contacting this one, sorry. Unlike tdarcos we've never spoken over skype, phone, etc.

But hey if someone has an email or something I'll be investigate just as thorough as the Paul Drake detective agency.

by Flack » Sun Aug 21, 2016 6:31 am

That's true -- that's the kind of thing he's liable to come back from the dead just to respond with unrelated Wikipedia quotes about.

by AArdvark » Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:23 am

Kerist, don't print that in big letters or we'll never see the end of Commander's posts.


THE
TIME STAND STILL
AARDVARK

Hey Jiz, let's get some Retro updates in here.

by pinback » Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:19 am

Well, you're the go-to guy now to find out which JC users are dead at any given point in time*.




(The phrase "point in time" is both redundant and nonsensical, since time is a mental construct only, and does not exist -- there are no "points in time", as there is no continuum of time in which there could exist any individual points. There is only the timeless now, ever-changing, ever-still, whole and inseparable.)

Top