by pinback » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:48 am
Tdarcos wrote:pinback wrote:Tdarcos wrote:
I don't. A game that consists of exactly 4 moves, ends with the player dying, has every move forced so that you have no alternative, represents something that isn't interactive fiction. I don't see where it deserves any awards.
What's the newness, the spark of creativity, the unusualness, the difference from anything else out there?
It might as well have been an automated PDF with a "more" button at the end of each page. Or a document displayed in MSDOS with the command TYPE spinning.txt | MORE . There is no interactivity, you might as well be reading a short story, and what is the point of doing it as an Interactive Fiction game?
Ben, exactly what is your malfunction? My comment is exactly on point and is relevant to the discussion
No, your comment completely misses the point and is thoroughly irrelevant to the discussion. But if I explained Flack's post to you, then I'd have to explain every other goddamn post on this BBS to you, and
I don't have that kind of time.
(Well, I do, but I'd rather spend it watching Day9 videos.)
[quote="Tdarcos"][quote="pinback"][quote="Tdarcos"]
I don't. A game that consists of exactly 4 moves, ends with the player dying, has every move forced so that you have no alternative, represents something that [i]isn't[/i] interactive fiction. I don't see where it deserves any awards.
What's the newness, the spark of creativity, the unusualness, the difference from anything else out there?
It might as well have been an automated PDF with a "more" button at the end of each page. Or a document displayed in MSDOS with the command TYPE spinning.txt | MORE . There is no interactivity, you might as well be reading a short story, and what is the point of doing it as an Interactive Fiction game?[/quote][/quote]
Ben, exactly what is your malfunction? My comment is exactly on point and is relevant to the discussion[/quote]
No, your comment completely misses the point and is thoroughly irrelevant to the discussion. But if I explained Flack's post to you, then I'd have to explain every other goddamn post on this BBS to you, and [i]I don't have that kind of time.[/i]
(Well, I do, but I'd rather spend it watching Day9 videos.)