What the fuck am I playing lately?
Moderators: AArdvark, Ice Cream Jonsey
What the fuck am I playing lately?
The reason most of you come here fifteen times an hour is to try to find out what the fuck I am playing lately. We all know that. Sadly, you have not been able to find that information recently. Therefore, I bring you this update, which you can read to find out what the fuck I am playing lately.
I am (fucking) playing two things lately:
1. Tiger Woods PGA 2003. This series has it over Links in almost every area but realism. It looks (much, much) better, it sounds better, it's more fun to play, and it's just generally cooler. The only thing wrong with it is that it tends to be a little too... how do I say this... easy as hell. Where breaking 90 in Links was almost as impressive an achievement as doing it in real life, you will likely be a scratch golfer by the end of your first evening with PGA 2003. After a week, you will rarely shoot anything in the 70's or above. I shot a 56 at Pebble Beach. Now, I'm great at the game, but even you could probably do okay, and you suck at games.
2. Command & Conquer: Generals. Now, you know, me and RTSes have a rather short and checkered past. But I'd been seeing screenshots of this thing for many many months, and it just looked SO impressive that I had to have it. And what a groundbreaking game it is! Get this: You have to COLLECT resources. Then you have to BUILD structures. Then you have to BUILD units. Then you have to GROUP the units together. Then you have to SEND THEM at the bad guys. Then you have to FORGET how you grouped your guys, and GET ALL confused about where they are and what they're doing. Then lots of STUFF happens, and you win or lose. Like I said, groundbreaking stuff! I will not make any ridiculous claim that I'm ever going to finish this game (I learned my lesson from WC3), but since I like tanks and missiles more than wizards and dragons, there's at least some chance I might actually ever play the game again. And it does look amazing. The level of detail is just shocking, that's the only word that comes to mind. Shocking.
So, that's what the fuck I am playing lately.
I am (fucking) playing two things lately:
1. Tiger Woods PGA 2003. This series has it over Links in almost every area but realism. It looks (much, much) better, it sounds better, it's more fun to play, and it's just generally cooler. The only thing wrong with it is that it tends to be a little too... how do I say this... easy as hell. Where breaking 90 in Links was almost as impressive an achievement as doing it in real life, you will likely be a scratch golfer by the end of your first evening with PGA 2003. After a week, you will rarely shoot anything in the 70's or above. I shot a 56 at Pebble Beach. Now, I'm great at the game, but even you could probably do okay, and you suck at games.
2. Command & Conquer: Generals. Now, you know, me and RTSes have a rather short and checkered past. But I'd been seeing screenshots of this thing for many many months, and it just looked SO impressive that I had to have it. And what a groundbreaking game it is! Get this: You have to COLLECT resources. Then you have to BUILD structures. Then you have to BUILD units. Then you have to GROUP the units together. Then you have to SEND THEM at the bad guys. Then you have to FORGET how you grouped your guys, and GET ALL confused about where they are and what they're doing. Then lots of STUFF happens, and you win or lose. Like I said, groundbreaking stuff! I will not make any ridiculous claim that I'm ever going to finish this game (I learned my lesson from WC3), but since I like tanks and missiles more than wizards and dragons, there's at least some chance I might actually ever play the game again. And it does look amazing. The level of detail is just shocking, that's the only word that comes to mind. Shocking.
So, that's what the fuck I am playing lately.
- Ice Cream Jonsey
- Posts: 30067
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: What the fuck am I playing lately?
I --Ben wrote:The reason most of you come here fifteen times an hour is to try to find out what the fuck I am playing lately.
Oh, who am I to argue.We all know that.
Well, that's because you banned yourself from the BBS for as of yet unexplained and unexplored reason, but still.Sadly, you have not been able to find that information recently.
Ah! Cool. Hey, quit putting two spaces after a period. You're fucking my quoting up here.Therefore, I bring you this update, which you can read to find out what the fuck I am playing lately.
Jesus Christ.I am (fucking) playing two things lately:
1. Tiger Woods PGA 2003.
"Masturbation is better than sex in every way except for how it feels."This series has it over Links in almost every area but realism.
You're dead to me.It looks (much, much) better, it sounds better, it's more fun to play, and it's just generally cooler.
Yeah, well, there's always Hot Shots Golf.The only thing wrong with it is that it tends to be a little too... how do I say this... easy as hell.
...Where breaking 90 in Links was almost as impressive an achievement as doing it in real life, you will likely be a scratch golfer by the end of your first evening with PGA 2003. After a week, you will rarely shoot anything in the 70's or above. I shot a 56 at Pebble Beach.
...Now, I'm great at the game,
What?but even you could probably do okay, and you suck at games.
No, seriously -- Tiger Woods over Links!?! DEAD. TO. ME.2. Command & Conquer: Generals. Now, you know, me and RTSes have a rather short and che
Unless the PC version of PGA is much better than the PS2 version. You can control the flight of the ball in Tiger Woods. I mean, Christ fucking died so that sins like this one would go uncommitted by man, dude!
the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!
Re: What the fuck am I playing lately?
It's a much better game.Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:No, seriously -- Tiger Woods over Links!?! DEAD. TO. ME.
What in the hell are you talking about?You can control the flight of the ball in Tiger Woods.
- Ice Cream Jonsey
- Posts: 30067
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: What the fuck am I playing lately?
In the PS2 version of the game you can effectively control the flight of the ball while in the air. I presume you can do this in the PC version as well.Ben wrote:What in the hell are you talking about?You can control the flight of the ball in Tiger Woods.
-- PresumerBot
the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!
Re: What the fuck am I playing lately?
No. No, you can't. I mean, you can hit fades and draws and whatever, but that's all determined when the club face meets the ball.Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:In the PS2 version of the game you can effectively control the flight of the ball while in the air. I presume you can do this in the PC version as well.
This once again goes to show that PS2 is baby games for babies.
- Ice Cream Jonsey
- Posts: 30067
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Okay. My brother has spent every Friday night for the last three years playing Tiger Woods PGA for the PS2 (in its various releases, natch) and while he has stated that this year's version is the best yet I cannot get into it because of how other-wordly BOP it is to be able to influence your shot once you've hit it.
Is C&C Generals significantly better than Warcraft III? Let me put this another way: I played C&C... shit, "Red Alert" or whatever the second one was called. Is there anything gripping about C&C Generals? What is the "magic" of C&C Generals?
Is C&C Generals significantly better than Warcraft III? Let me put this another way: I played C&C... shit, "Red Alert" or whatever the second one was called. Is there anything gripping about C&C Generals? What is the "magic" of C&C Generals?
the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!
Are you absolutely CERTAIN that this is the case? I find it hard to believe, but even if it IS in the game, I'm certain it's a special "mode" you have to select. Like, "baby mode" or something. Please look into this.Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:I cannot get into it because of how other-wordly BOP it is to be able to influence your shot once you've hit it.
Better graphics. Campaign story not as compelling or interesting (yet). Tanks instead of dragons. So, I'll say: NO, not significantly better.Is C&C Generals significantly better than Warcraft III?
I never played any of the other C&C games, so I can't compare it to them. All I know is, you're getting an amazing looking RTS with a ridiculous amount of detail and effort spent on the "little touches", even though it's essentially the same game as every other RTS in history. And (I can't stress this enough) TANKS INSTEAD OF DRAGONS.or whatever the second one was called. Is there anything gripping about C&C Generals? What is the "magic" of C&C Generals?
- Ice Cream Jonsey
- Posts: 30067
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
I don't remember any dragons in Warcraft II. Maybe they added them to Warcraft III. I don't know.Ben wrote:I never played any of the other C&C games, so I can't compare it to them. All I know is, you're getting an amazing looking RTS with a ridiculous amount of detail and effort spent on the "little touches", even though it's essentially the same game as every other RTS in history. And (I can't stress this enough) TANKS INSTEAD OF DRAGONS.
The thing I got from your post is that while both of those games are interesting, I should not endeavor to race out and get them once I get some free time.
Free time might be spent on real-life, shockingly enough. To wit:
"Play any EQ or UO?" -- Interviewer
"How about RL... as in REAL LIFE?" -- Paul Steed
"HAHAHAHAHAHAALLORLRLROR" -- EVERYONE, EVERYWHERE
the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!
There are dragons in WC3. But I was speaking figuratively. FIGURATIVE dragos.Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:added them to Warcraft III. I don't know.
If you like computer golf, it is essential that you buy (the PC version of) Tiger Woods 2003. If you like RTS games that look good, but aren't particularly revolutionary otherwise, you have to get Generals. They are both excellent, excellent games. Generals might be less excellent if you are an RTS veteran, which (amazingly, since I've purchased like 50 of them) I am not (because I only played like 2 of them, and only for a half hour each.)The thing I got from your post is that while both of those games are interesting, I should not endeavor to race out and get them once I get some free time.
I'd like to revisit this thread and mention that at the time, I was deep into the "career mode", and had notched all my stats up to the point where if I kept the mouse somewhere on the table while I was swinging, I could not help but hit a 350 yard drive straight down the middle. In the final tournament, at the Old Course at St. Andrews, my worst score was a 59. At this point I was saying that the game was "very easy".
Then I went back, into non-career mode, set everything to the highest difficulty, and now the game is most decidedly NOT very easy. Breaking 80 is an excellent score. So, I take it back.
Clearly the best computer golf game ever.
Then I went back, into non-career mode, set everything to the highest difficulty, and now the game is most decidedly NOT very easy. Breaking 80 is an excellent score. So, I take it back.
Clearly the best computer golf game ever.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:01 am
- Ice Cream Jonsey
- Posts: 30067
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact: