Flack wrote:I have seen that, and have been following it closely. I don't understand how the courts allow those things to happen.
Bribes?
People are allowed to file for patents retroactively and then sue people using free technology? Someone should put a stop to that.
Hey fella, there's too much money there, and where people smell money, it ain't long before campaign contributions come along so they can get a piece of that pie that's about as fat as ol' Ironside you're talkin' to.
The only saving grave for people like me is that being such small, small, tiny low hanging fruit,
Don't dismiss low hanging fruit, if they have even the slightest smell of money or influence to manipulate others (or both) they might go after that, too.
they wouldn't make any money from suing a person like me.
No, but it might be useful later on to make other people go along, if they pick a strategy like RIAA's new book, "How to Sue Customers and Influence People (Into Going to Indy Music)." That lady Debbie Foster ain't got no money but the RIAA sued her for a judgment for a ton of money she ain't never gonna have over file sharing. Probably figure they can scare other people into not doing it, or use it to continue extorting it out of people in "settlement" agreements. Settle or get sued.
Instead they sue Apple and companies in the middle and people making money off of their shows. It's a racket that someone should put a stop to for sure.
Hey fella, you got the money to pay campaign contributions? If not, best you start finding ways to get people to try and run against some of these sick sons-a-bitches who are in the pockets of the people who make money off this.
