Crazy Doodles

AArdvark · Post by **AArdvark** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:13 pm

Man, they's some good beers!

THE
CHEESUS!
AARDVARK

Tdarcos · Post by **Tdarcos** » Wed Sep 28, 2016 3:48 pm

AArdvark · Post by **AArdvark** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 5:41 pm

This one is unfinished. Mostly because I lost interest but it's still funny to me.

AArdvark · Post by **AArdvark** » Sat Oct 29, 2016 4:45 pm

Ice Cream Jonsey · Post by **Ice Cream Jonsey** » Sat Oct 29, 2016 8:37 pm

I'm going to need clarification on "Pigwiper." Family name?

Flack · Post by **Flack** » Sun Oct 30, 2016 5:43 am

She was a good dancer, if I remember correctly.

AArdvark · Post by **AArdvark** » Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:24 pm

Captain Pigwiper was a seagoing man.

His son, George was a bricklayer by trade.

His granddaughter Edna, enjoyed gardening and Japanese beetles.

THE
SOUNDS SO NORMAL
ON THE SURFACE
AARDVARK

edit: And there was a whole 'Jaws: The Revenge' undercurrent as well.....

AArdvark · Post by **AArdvark** » Wed Nov 09, 2016 7:50 pm

Well, if energy cannot be made into matter then it's a one way street. Matter becomes energy but not energy becomes matter. Given enough time the entire universe will be all energy.

THE
AARDVARK HAWKING

Tdarcos · Post by **Tdarcos** » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:33 am

AArdvark wrote:Well, if energy cannot be made into matter then it's a one way street. Matter becomes energy but not energy becomes matter. Given enough time the entire universe will be all energy.

Nope, not quite. Planets revolve around their suns because of the force of gravity. When suns supernova - like ours will in an estimated 4-8 billion years - they incinerate their planets as they break apart. Even if they turn into black holes eventually that runs out of energy and they become stardust again.

Eventually the universe will degrade to absolute zero and motionless stardust. No light, no energy, no time, just quiet, dead space.

And stardust. As so it was in the beginning it shall be again.

Just like Hillary Clinton did, one day the universe will lose and it will all be over.

AArdvark · Post by **AArdvark** » Sun Nov 13, 2016 2:55 pm

Billy Mays · Post by **Billy Mays** » Sun Nov 13, 2016 4:17 pm

Tdarcos wrote:When suns supernova - like ours will in an estimated 4-8 billion years...

Our sun does not have enough mass to become a supernova according to Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar and NASA.

By a Landslide · Post by **By a Landslide** » Mon Nov 14, 2016 1:33 am

And can anyone guess which one of those won't be around in 4 years?

Tdarcos · Post by **Tdarcos** » Mon Nov 14, 2016 8:57 am

Billy Mays wrote:
Tdarcos wrote:When suns supernova - like ours will in an estimated 4-8 billion years...
Our sun does not have enough mass to become a supernova according to Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar and NASA.

Well, that's a recent discovery. Everything I had heard said eventually the sun will expand outward and incinerate all the planets in its general area including earth, then either collapsing into something or bursting like a balloon.

Since the general consensus as I understood it was the sun was going to have some sort of explosive event incinerating at least everything as far as Mars, I thought it was.

But whether or not it will technically "supernova," as it is my understanding it is eventually going to destroy everything within about 150-200 million miles, is a distinction without a difference.

Billy Mays · Post by **Billy Mays** » Mon Nov 14, 2016 12:30 pm

Tdarcos wrote:Well, that's a recent discovery.

The "Chandrasekhar limit" was discovered in 1930.

Tdarcos wrote:Everything I had heard said eventually the sun will expand outward and incinerate all the planets in its general area including earth, then either collapsing into something

Yes, our Sun will cook everything alive and boil the oceans as it transitions to a Red Giant in the next 5.5 billion years, before transitioning into a White Dwarf and cooling down for trillions of years.

Tdarcos wrote:or bursting like a balloon.

That is absurd.

Tdarcos wrote:Since the general consensus as I understood it was the sun was going to have some sort of explosive event incinerating at least everything as far as Mars, I thought it was.

Trying to figure out whose "general consensus" this could possibly be is making my brain hurt.

Tdarcos wrote:But whether or not it will technically "supernova,"

There is no gray area when it comes to supernovas, they are a thoroughly defined event.

Tdarcos wrote:as it is my understanding it is eventually going to destroy everything within about 150-200 million miles, is a distinction without a difference.

It is actually a distinction with a huge difference for the purposes of understanding our universe.

AArdvark · Post by **AArdvark** » Mon Nov 14, 2016 6:43 pm

I demand that the rest of this cosmology discussion be done entirely in doodles. Or at least artful diagrams.

This all stemmed from the observation that energy cannot be transformed back into matter. But it's great filler until I post more crazy doodles.

THE
GET SKETCHING
AARDVARK

Billy Mays · Post by **Billy Mays** » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:28 am

AArdvark wrote:energy cannot be transformed back into matter.

That is incredibly close to being disproven.

AArdvark · Post by **AArdvark** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:52 pm

this whole thing stemmed from me thinking to myself, which I am wont to do at odd times, what if I did Einstein's equation backwards. So I gave it a shot and that brought me to this thread. Or at least this filler part of this thread.

THE
COSMIC
INTERRUPTION
AARDVARK

Commander WilliamTdarmays · Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:16 pm

I am glad to see your sketches are returning to brighten up this gloomy place.

AArdvark · Post by **AArdvark** » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:08 am

They never went away. In reality I don't drink that much.

THE
BUT WHEN I DO
I DRINK DOS EQUIS
AARDVARK

AArdvark · Post by **AArdvark** » Sat Dec 10, 2016 6:45 pm