Hey Robb

[Debaser]

Since you and I aren't quite best web buddies enough to exchange e-mail, I have no clue whether beaver@zombieworld is still your primary or if it languishes unchecked these days. If the latter is the case, be sure to check it today, for my "future update week" contribution.

[Ice Cream Jonsey]

Yeah, beaver@zombieworld.com is definitely a fine e-mail address to use. The only other one that I have is robb@joltcountry.com, but they are essentially the same box as everything gets dumped into the same spot on my hard drive through Eudora when I get home.

I can't begin to express the <strike>raging ere--</strike> levels of pumpitude I have after seeing what you sent me. You're the freaking man. I have refrained from installing Word on this computer here at work due to all the kiddie scripts by script kiddies that enjoy using Word as a sort of launching pad for annoying attacks, so I am going to get home and give it a read through. I sent off my questionnaire for Bruce yesterday, so we actually have *FOUR* slots for "Update Week" currently nabbed. Previous "Update Weeks" have had us updating three times at most in a given week, and I had to struggle to do it. Let me see if I can churn out a few thousand words (and a few hundred swear words) over Jinxter or something, and we will have a number of updates for "Update Week" that I previously thought unreachable.



...

.. Also: GOLDEN AGE.

[Ice Cream Jonsey]

Just re-reading my post, I wasn't quite as forward with "Update Week" plans as I could be, especially with PTX and James Bond set with content for the Content Beaver to devour:

I'm going to do my best to get everything set for June 16th. We actually probably could have started this week, but I blew it by missing Monday and Tuesday. I'll throw up one update per day, etc., and then presuming there isn't an Update Week II: Cruise Control and so forth, leave the links on the front page of the RFTK site, as they tend to get the most hits.

In true update week tradition, I will take the lead on inserting the name of a piece of Anime into one of the pages and then insulting those who have experience said piece of Anime. I will attempt to do this in my as-of-yet unwritten personal update, and will endeavor to:

1) Make it so that not only fans of this to-be-determined piece are harshly and unfairly slagged, but also anyone whose eyes have merely scanned the broken-English inscribed, ditto-machined box copy

2) Be horribly and trollishly inaccurate, which is a departure from Debaser's earlier precedent


For great justice, I remain your friendly neighborhood system operator.