Page 2 of 2

Re: How was Aardvark able to post on (and thus ruin) a "Best Of" thread?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 1:40 am
by Jizaboz
Billy Mays wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 9:33 am
Tdarcos wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 5:08 amI mean, for example, take myself and my opinions of others.
This was the shittiest and most retarded breakdown of anything I have ever read in my entire life. How many one sentence posts have you seen from these people and you said TL;DR and just went ahead and posted 19 paragraphs of completely random and false bullshit? It's like you're on a completely different planet.
Well, he did make a cocaine reference

Re: How was Aardvark able to post on (and thus ruin) a "Best Of" thread?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 12:10 pm
by Billy Mays
Jizaboz wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2020 1:40 am
Billy Mays wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 9:33 am
Tdarcos wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 5:08 amI mean, for example, take myself and my opinions of others.
This was the shittiest and most retarded breakdown of anything I have ever read in my entire life. How many one sentence posts have you seen from these people and you said TL;DR and just went ahead and posted 19 paragraphs of completely random and false bullshit? It's like you're on a completely different planet.
Well, he did make a cocaine reference
As an AArdvark supporter, I should have known better than to stoop to the level that I did there. I regret doing it. That is the sort of uncalled for nastiness that pinback supporters such as Casual Observer, The "Happiness" Engine, and RetroRomper always resort to. What a group of disgusting, horrible people they are. It makes me wonder how Finsternis ever got banned in the first place considering the norm here.

Re: How was Aardvark able to post on (and thus ruin) a "Best Of" thread?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 2:23 pm
by Tdarcos
Billy Mays wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 9:33 am
Tdarcos wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 5:08 amI mean, for example, take myself and my opinions of others.
This was the shittiest and most retarded breakdown of anything I have ever read in my entire life.
Then you're due for an eye check. What is it with you lately? I say something, then you say something to the effect of "You're wrong, but either I can't explain why or I don't want to bother saying why and I don't want to admit either." You gave the most flippant dismissal of everything I said with absolutely no explanation of reasons why you disagreed with it.

If you're so smart and I'm so dumb, why don't you try educating me? Then maybe we could both benefit. You'd show your magnanimous generosity in allowing me to learn something and allowing me to understand how what I said was wrong, and I would learn where I had made a mistake.

But no, you didn't do that, you just dismissed everything I said as if it was so meaningless as to be beneath you to explain why, as if doing so was the equivalent of cleaning up someone else's vomit barehanded.

I said, (1) Some people here may have been a little thin skinned and maybe need to be a little more tolerant or understanding; (2) Finn was a nasty person but I have a thick skin; (2) Pinback seems to draw negative emotions but we still care about him; (3) Aardvark seemed to be excessively touchy for reasons I don't understand; (4) Jonsey's problem is we give him ulcers and headaches. According to you, all of this is wrong. The reason? Dead silence.

You seem to be physically unable to explain what I said that was wrong, misguided, or improper. Often this sort of behavior as you displayed is the hallmark of someone who doesn't want to admit the other person is right. If that isn't the case, then you could have offered us all a "teachable moment," and offered me the opportunity to learn from my mistakes and grow.
Billy Mays wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2020 9:33 am How many one sentence posts have you seen from these people and you said TL;DR and just went ahead and posted 19 paragraphs of completely random and false bullshit? It's like you're on a completely different planet.
I think you're the one departing Uranus because what you just said makes no sense. It's a pure non sequitur. The result does not follow from the premise. Someone else made a one-line statement and I felt it was too long, and instead wrote 19 paragraphs. So, you're saying I think a long block of text is shorter than one line.

If you wanted to make a rational argument it would have been better if you had said that I talk too much, where someone else uses one line and i would uae several pages. That would have made sense.

When you can start making sense I'll start listening to you. Until then...

Re: How was Aardvark able to post on (and thus ruin) a "Best Of" thread?

Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2020 2:47 pm
by Billy Mays
Tdarcos wrote: Sun Jul 19, 2020 2:23 pm What is it with you lately?
You are absolutely right here and I am completely wrong. How I've been treating you is inexcusable, and if I didn't make it clear enough in my last post here then I hope to make it clear now, I would like to apologize for all of it.