Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:21 am
by ChainGangGuy
Let's try to summon danzaland. We need him now more than ever.

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:29 am
by Tdarcos
pinback wrote:
Tdarcos wrote: Were you born an asshole or did you have to train for it?
You just replied to the same post twice within a 20 minute period.

You are completely insane.
I am not insane. I am simply mad because I asked a simple question, "What is OWL certification with respect to this BBS since it is not referring to the usual and customary definition, which is church certification for sexuality training?" This is a question you should have been able to answer - if you actually had an answer - in a simple response in maybe 5 lines.

Instead of answering, you've been deflecting in full-on attack mode, attacking me for asking the question, and saying I'm too stupid to understand the answer. That's clearly a red flag indicating you don't have an answer.

In the alternative, you simply could have said it was a joke and there is no such thing. But if that is the case, apparently you're too gutless to admit it.

When I was asked about my mistake in the Waffles video about calling the hero antagonist in Die Hard III, "John McCain" instead of "John McClane" I simply admitted it. There's no shame in being wrong, it's the only way we learn anything.

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:39 am
by Tdarcos
pinback wrote:
Tdarcos wrote:You proceed, with no evidence, proof or justification, to trash my opinion. You have absolutely nothing to dispute my statement, and yet you proceed to trash me for making it.
http://water.usgs.gov/edu/raindropsizes.html
http://spikesworld.spike-jamie.com/scie ... -size.html
http://www.livescience.com/7809-raindro ... sizes.html
http://indianapublicmedia.org/amomentof ... ops-sizes/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8155883.stm
So why didn't you just say that in the first place instead of immediately going into asshole mode and trashing me? Oh yeah, I forgot, it's your usual and customary practice of trying to drive people away from here.

I will note, however, that USGS points out that drops are typically 0.05 mm when they first fall and as they collide with other drops they merge. So I think my original statement that rain drops are the same size can be clarified by saying "Rain Drops are all the same size when they first fall from the cloud, then become larger as they collide with others, until they become too large and split." I stand corrected. And I did it in <s>8</s> 5 lines. Half size.

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 10:04 am
by Flack
On today's show, the boys struggle with someone's sanity.

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 10:07 am
by Flack
pinback wrote:Look, I've provided some excellent hot sauce-related content around here lately, and am getting even less response than your average Don Rogers show.

I will stop talking about it if nobody cares. If that's what's to happen, I will make one final hot sauce thread, in which I state my conclusions after a lifetime spent chasin' heat, and then I will never bring it up again.

Is that what you want? IS IT?

Because it's kind of what I want! So that's cool! Hopefully we can all agree on this.
I started this thread in early March. The first response (yours) came 18 weeks later at the end of July. My plan was to craft a witty response and post it mid-November, until Spinner came along and dripped diarrhea all over it.

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 10:30 pm
by Ice Cream Jonsey
Paul, this thread and the Elite thread are two threads that you have ruined.

They were enjoyable threads that you have turned into a wasteland.

Why's it gotta be like this? Why can't you admit that sometimes you have nothing to contribute to the thread and then NOT post in it? Why's it gotta be like this?

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 12:18 pm
by Tdarcos
Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:Paul, this thread and the Elite thread are two threads that you have ruined.

They were enjoyable threads that you have turned into a wasteland.

Why's it gotta be like this? Why can't you admit that sometimes you have nothing to contribute to the thread and then NOT post in it? Why's it gotta be like this?
Because when this is discovered, there is no means to remove the erroneous material, if necessary, moving it somewhere else. And apparently you want it impossible to remove extraneous and/or unnecessary material. You have so stated that you want it this way. You and you alone have the exclusive power to change this state of affairs any time you want it to be changed.

And by the way, there are threads I do not respond to because I do not have anything to say.

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 6:46 am
by ChainGangGuy
It has become obvious we're in desperate need for some approach to get this thread back on track. Any ideas? Sure, we would never win any such review by the OWL board to reinstate our certification (though I've optimistically sent that request), but, perhaps we can still make some exciting discoveries regarding Tabasco being sold in scant two-ounce bottles.

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 8:02 am
by AArdvark
Two ounces aren't enough. Must be larger then airplane bottles for it to work.


THE
SCOVILLE PERFUME
AARDVARK