Page 1 of 1

Are comic books readers really this SQUEAKY CLEAN?

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2002 1:14 am
by ChainGangGuy
Grabbin' the whisker biscuit.

Poopie trim.

MAN-CHOWDER


You know friends, if I were at the helm of my very own Marvel comic, I would have just turned away nearly half of my entire readership. Its true! Through conversations with several regular Marvel readers both in person and online, I have gleaned the following: comic book readers abhor potty-mouths. Filthy dialogue, drug references, implications of rape and references to big, luscious titties, all of it is strongly disapproved of by the average reader. Fuck!

"Make Mine Marvel -- and squeaky clean please!"

Recently, there has been a tremendous amount of upheaval and distraught in the Marvel community, particularly with the Fantastic Four readers. Thus far, they're highly appalled at the startling appearance of strikingly crass and base dialogue within the comic's (at least in their opinion) wholesome, hug-able, family-oriented pages. Here's just a few of the comments being debated:


1. Use of the word "frigging."

2. The phrase "drain the lizard." (Issue #60)

3. And a slight sexual innuendo between Sue and Richard Reeds (Issue #62) where Mr. Fantastic mentions, "I'm told she likes the way I stretch my... imagination."


That's it, folks! Geez, how uptight can these people be? My daily speech is peppered with foul language, so maybe I'm not the best judge of such matters, but I simply cannot fathom how these few comments could "poison" Marvel's more youthful readers. As with most topics, I was fully ready to hear both sides of the argument. However, the opposition to Marvel's seemingly Puritanical readership is nearly nonexistent. Perhaps they're too busy letting those foul expletives fly or just draining their lizards. Am I standing alone on this? Seems so.

Many readers are attacking the current writers over this issue, accusing them of lacking the talent and creativity to write and illustrate comics that are both "sophisticated" in their story and accessible to all ages. There are those that perceive the use of the single word "frigging" has turned comics into an "incestuous industry." Personally, I feel the whole controversy is all rooted in the mistaken notion that comics are for children, and that a fully diversified product line is not useful for luring kids into the market. It is a mistaken idea that "one size fits all", as well as hanging hysterically onto an idea that has not worked in the marketplace for ages. Sure, squeaky clean superhero comics worked during the period from the forties to the seventies, but times have drastically changed! The kid readers just aren't there. Shit, Marvel has even stated they are not making comics for children.

Motherfuck, isn't it the job of the parent to teach them what is and is not acceptable language? Instead of trying to control the world around you, why not simply try to be more effective with the only element you have any measure of control over, your child? Some will argue they simply wish to remove and keep dirty words out of the hands of their children. Ah, but their goal shouldn't be to keep dirty words out of the hands of all kids, but out of the hands of their kids. That determination is not theirs to make for other parents. These parents have the option to not allow the comic to be brought into their home. There's absolutely no need whatsoever to tell another person what they can and can't write about or what language they can use. However, its within everyone's right to be able to tell Marvel what the content of their comics should be, but after you tell Marvel what you think the contents of their comics should be, Marvel has the perfect right to tell you to go straight to hell.

Kids rejected comic books in the 90s. They didn't want anything to do with them, even when they were 'all-ages'. Let's face it, it isn't the kids who are having problems with these comics, it's parents with rigid morals who I hope are in the vast minority. The occasional sex innuendo, dick n' fart joke, violence, drug reference or flopping titty comment are perfectly fine by me. I'm curious to know how the rest of you readers feel about mature dialogue in comics, so do chime in if you have a moment.

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2002 7:06 pm
by Ice Cream Jonsey
Kids rejected comic books in the 90s. They didn't want anything to do with them, even when they were 'all-ages'.
This is a great point. One that I don't think I've ever seen made before. And it's right, really. Sure, the "speculative" marketing tactics hurt, but there hasn't been an incoming wave of new readers from the kiddies to replace those that are lost for various other reasons. By and large, the numbers indicate that kids just don't give a damn.

I'm not necessarily blaming them, either. The cost of a given comic book is ridiculously overpriced. Yeah, sure, there is inflation and all, but comic books are one of those products that will get viewed against perception -- much in the same way an arcade game will forever be linked with costing a quarter, comic books are though to provide about a dollar's worth of entertainment. I am lucky enough to be in a situation where I buy few enough books that it doesn't matter what they cost, but no way could I afford to keep up with more than a couple lines if I were 15 and making what I made at 15.

And (predictably) I am with you on the language thing. What is thought of as "comic book dialogue" sucks. Anything that gets these characters speaking more like real people is fine with me. And, it should be noted -- real people swear. Hell, I can more easily buy the concept of a guy from NYC turning into an enormous rock-covered Thing than I can a guy from NYC able to express himself for 30 years without dropping 10 f-bombs an issue.

Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2002 2:57 am
by Ice Cream Jonsey
Also -- if you like I would be quite thrilled to put this on the www page. Izzat cool?

Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2002 4:34 pm
by Worm
Every female in comic books are basically poured into their clothes. Most of the dialouge does stink. People really think that regular people are sophisticated? I can understand Professor X not cursing but Wolveriene?

Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:22 am
by ChainGangGuy
Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:Also -- if you like I would be quite thrilled to put this on the www page. Izzat cool?
Sounds good to me! :eek:

Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:22 am
by ChainGangGuy
Hey Jonsey, have you had a chance to pick up any of the Kevin Smith Black Cat issues?

Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2002 5:20 pm
by Ice Cream Jonsey
I picked up the first one, but I decided to take a pass on the rest of the series.

I just really didn't think that the series had much going for it, or that it was going to go anywhere. I could be wrong for all I know, but the first issue of any series ought to really impress. This one was just kinda moot.

It really just seemed like Smith was saying, "Hey, I can take any character -- any character at all -- and sell a million billion copies with him/her." What's compelling about this interpretation of the Black Cat? There was nothing before the first issue in that series and nothing afterwards. She always just seemed to come off as some jealous bitch and was never written correctly based on her premise. In fact, I think the only time she was ever interesting was in that "What If?" comic that dealt with Peter getting shot down in his marriage proposal to Mary Jane.

Furthermore, there was never any indication that she looked like the voluptous pinup girl that she was drawn as for this comic. I realise that that's the artist's "thing" and all, but I think it's a mistake to contort the character to fit your drawing style. But that's kind of a minor quibble.

I don't know -- overall I think that there is a decent story somewhere with the Black Cat, because she's one of, what, two or three females in the entire Marvel line who knows that Peter Parker is Spider-Man, and can therefore see and appreciate the guy as who he completely is, rather than just knowing him as the super-hero or knowing him as the regular guy. Additionally, with her not being married to him, there is no inherent directive that she has to see him in glowing terms. I think that she could provide a neat way of looking at Spider-Man if used correctly. Maybe that's what Smith ended up doing in the later issues (and if so I applaud him -- more, he certainly has proven that he can come up with a solid take on male-female relationships) but it didn't appear that it was going to go that way from the start. Also, wasn't issue 3 or 4 hideously late as well?

Did you happen to grab it? If so, what was your take?

FUCK YOUR FACE

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:29 pm
by Ihaveahandjobinmypants
:wink: :twisted: :evil: :wink: :wink: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :idea: :neutral: :-x :shock: :eek: :eek: :smile:
L:FH*YEWU EWFH IDSUFIS (*PCvREG P[]REG]
TR
BTRS
HNYTRS
NYTRS
N
FTXDJS
TRJHN
SYRHN
TRSJN
YTRS
JGYD
JGYD
J








JJ
J
JJ
J
JJ
J
JJJ

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2004 9:22 pm
by ChainGangGuy
Bumped after nearly two full years. Just like Marvel -- doesn't anything stay dead?

You still even reading comics these days, Robb?

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:03 pm
by Ice Cream Jonsey
Yeah. I downloaded a whole bunch of "Deadpool."

Does the writing get actually funny at this point? Or is it funny like how video game writing is "good." In other words "good for the genre."

Maybe you don't know because you don't read Deadpool.

I don't know.

He has a nice costume, though!

They've always been fags :(

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:05 pm
by Worm
Image

I'm catching up on the Punisher comics and this caught my eye.
Transcribed for bond wow :(
Dear Punisher staff,
I'm writing in regards to the letter in THE PUNISHER #9. The letter was from the "Seekers."
I disagree with them fully.
I innocently purchased a book-length comic from your Distinguished Competition. I read it and to my disappointment there was swearing and cursing all overi n it. I was very disappointed!
To me, that spoils a comic book. Comics are made to entertain people of all kinds. Many people don't want that [swearing and cursing] in a comic!
The Defender
(No address on letter)

Dear Punishers,
Until now I have never had a reason for wrting, but now I have one. It's about one of the letters you received in issue #9. The writers asked you if your would make the Punisher MRO (Mature Readers Only) because they wanted to change #%*! into curse words. I totally disagree. I'm 13 years old and I love the Punisher and so do many of my friends.

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 7:29 pm
by Ice Cream Jonsey
He's 13 years old, loves irresponsible wanton capital punishment, hates cursing. What ever will he do?! Plus, his FRIENDS want to love the Punisher as well!! Why won't Garth let them?

The whole "friends" thing rings about as clearly as people who tell you, in their negative review of a movie, "that the whole theatre was laughing at it." Sure they were, pal! The 9:35 showing of The Chronicles of Grimshaw was made entirely of ultra-ironic would-be hipsters! Man, they totally got together afterwards to the Safeway and group-mocked the "Collateral" and "Princess Diaries II" promo cut outs. Haw haw haw!!!

Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2005 8:18 am
by Worm
Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:He's 13 years old, loves irresponsible wanton capital punishment, hates cursing. What ever will he do?! Plus, his FRIENDS want to love the Punisher as well!! Why won't Garth let them?
This is the first series, Garth was working on the one from 2000 and the one in recent circulation.

I used to

Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 12:46 pm
by Knuckles the CLown
read all of the Spider-Man comics. After Peter and Mary Jane were married there was sexual ineundo in every fucking issue. I'd quote from those issues but my cunt mom has all of my comics in her basement and we don't speak.