The short way from Pennsylvania to Maryland: California
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:33 pm
I have an electric wheelchair that I had to order a new power supply. Hoverround's PS would be a (tongue-swallowing) $250.00, so I go on-line and find another supplier that sells a 12V 5A supplier with an XPL connector (3 pins) for $37.00. Express (UPS 3-day) shipping is another $17.50 (as opposed to $9.50 for UPS ground which can take over a week.)
So they e-mail me the tracking number, 1Z9148X81259830640. It shipped from the seller to UPS distribution site in Philadelphia, where it was put on a flight to... Oakland, California. Then transported to the UPS package routing facility in San Jose. It's supposedly on-track to get here by Friday, but I find it rather humorous that it's faster or more efficient to send something 3,000 miles away.
Yes, yes, I know FedEx does the same thing; all packages go through their hub in Memphis and are routed back to the destination from there. It still seems funny.
I sometimes wonder if they might have better results with smaller regional hubs as opposed to one massive hub at one site. Whether this makes them more efficient I don't know, but as bad as the Post Office is, if they used the same kind of hub-and-spoke system as these package processors did, mail would probably take a lot more time.
Witness the fact that ever since the Postal Service started using FedEx to process Express Mail, the on-time delivery rate has dropped so much they've had to increase the amount of time that a package has to get somewhere before it qualifies for the late delivery refund.
I remember sending a Christmas package to my best friend in Colorado. I shipped it out of the nearest Post Office that could promise delivery by Christmas, which was the Merrifield, Virginia distribution center. (I was living in Arlington, Virginia at the time.) So I take the package in, and it's $22. Most of which I used postage stamps I had on hand. So I shipped it on, like, the 21st for delivery on the 23rd.
It gets there on the 24th. Still before Christmas, but since it was after the promised delivery time, I get my $22 back! The only thing nicer than getting a Christmas package to someone on time is getting it to them for free!
So they e-mail me the tracking number, 1Z9148X81259830640. It shipped from the seller to UPS distribution site in Philadelphia, where it was put on a flight to... Oakland, California. Then transported to the UPS package routing facility in San Jose. It's supposedly on-track to get here by Friday, but I find it rather humorous that it's faster or more efficient to send something 3,000 miles away.
Yes, yes, I know FedEx does the same thing; all packages go through their hub in Memphis and are routed back to the destination from there. It still seems funny.
I sometimes wonder if they might have better results with smaller regional hubs as opposed to one massive hub at one site. Whether this makes them more efficient I don't know, but as bad as the Post Office is, if they used the same kind of hub-and-spoke system as these package processors did, mail would probably take a lot more time.
Witness the fact that ever since the Postal Service started using FedEx to process Express Mail, the on-time delivery rate has dropped so much they've had to increase the amount of time that a package has to get somewhere before it qualifies for the late delivery refund.
I remember sending a Christmas package to my best friend in Colorado. I shipped it out of the nearest Post Office that could promise delivery by Christmas, which was the Merrifield, Virginia distribution center. (I was living in Arlington, Virginia at the time.) So I take the package in, and it's $22. Most of which I used postage stamps I had on hand. So I shipped it on, like, the 21st for delivery on the 23rd.
It gets there on the 24th. Still before Christmas, but since it was after the promised delivery time, I get my $22 back! The only thing nicer than getting a Christmas package to someone on time is getting it to them for free!