Hey, the new website will look like shit

by **pinback** » Sat Nov 26, 2005 11:22 am

That's really disappointing.

by **Vitriola** » Sat Nov 26, 2005 11:20 am

Sorry I assumed you would post the wrong URL on your webs--, wait, I mean, sorry I assumed you were vaguely correcting my mistake, because you never do that, instead of realizing you were sneakily trying to correct your own, in an underhanded and demure way so that any reader on here might, if they were not looking carefully, also think I was the idiot, instead of you.

by **Bob Green** » Sat Nov 26, 2005 12:36 am

pinback wrote:I apologize for destroying your favorite website. I was not aware that it held any value for you, or anyone else. If I had it all to do over again, I would have chosen a different path. Alas, I've rung a bell which cannot be unrung, so all I can do is apologize for any inconvenience, disappointment, or other unpleasantry which you've felt as a result.

It was not my intention to displease you (or anyone). I apologize if I did.

Wow.

by **pinback** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 11:51 pm

I apologize for destroying your favorite website. I was not aware that it held any value for you, or anyone else. If I had it all to do over again, I would have chosen a different path. Alas, I've rung a bell which cannot be unrung, so all I can do is apologize for any inconvenience, disappointment, or other unpleasantry which you've felt as a result.

It was not my intention to displease you (or anyone). I apologize if I did.

by **ICJ** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 11:36 pm

Sorry, I'm not going to get one or Sorry, I nuked your favorite website?

by **pinback** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:46 pm

Sorry.

by **Ice Cream Jonsey** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:44 pm

Okay, I want an apology for the destruction of Creepingmaw first.

by **pinback** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:39 pm

Yeah, well, I hope you also APOLOGIZE.

Because now I demand an apology from YOUR ass too. Both of you people. I expect the rest of these retards to be horrible to me, because they're morons. But from YOU people, I DEMAND APOLOGIES.

One each. And they better be GOOD apologies, or I don't even want to THINK about the length of time that I will leave for.

by **Vitriola** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:09 pm

I don't read. I click.

by **pinback** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:08 pm

I think you are going insane. "contextualtherapy" is not the same as "contextualpsychology", with or without a period. That's why I corrected it in my message above, which you then tore me a new one for, because you can't fucking read.

by **Vitriola** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 4:00 pm

pinback wrote:Right. http://contextualpsychology.org.

A-ha, here is the problem. You need the period on the end. The link on your website http://contextualtherapy.org does not have it, and therefore does not go anywhere, at least with Firefox on my computer. THEN, as if it weren't weird enough, when you get to the website, it shows the URL with both the period at the end and a backslash. That's fucked up.

by **Vitriola** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 3:47 pm

pinback wrote:Right. http://contextualpsychology.org.

But the tutorial is most easily found at http://www.relationalframetheory.com/tutorial/

Thank you.

Right. When you type in that URL, YES, WITHOUT THE WWW AS IF ONE, I DON'T KNOW, COPIED AND PASTED, that is the exact message you get. I do not know why they append the www to the message. Maybe you should have, you know, tried it, before you assumed I had the IQ of last night's dinner.

Thank you.

by **pinback** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 3:29 pm

Right. http://contextualpsychology.org.

But the tutorial is most easily found at http://www.relationalframetheory.com/tutorial/

Thank you.

by **Vitriola** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 11:58 am

Ben wrote:Relational Frame Theory Tutorial Quiz at http://contextualtherapy.org

Alert! www.contextualtherapy.org could not be found. Please check the name and try again.

by **pinback** » Fri Nov 25, 2005 7:10 am

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:Well, that was easy. Thanks, Pinner! Be sure to stay tuned for an EXCITING THANKSGIVING DAY ANNOUNCEMENT that involves YOU PERSONALLY.

by **Ice Cream Jonsey** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:32 pm

Just watch this space for an exciting announcement. That's all I'm saying.

by **pinback** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:26 pm

Does it also involve an apology?

by **Ice Cream Jonsey** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:05 pm

I... oh.

Oh.

Well, that was easy. Thanks, Pinner! Be sure to stay tuned for an EXCITING THANKSGIVING DAY ANNOUNCEMENT that involves YOU PERSONALLY.

by **pinback** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 1:35 pm

base-article.html
-------------
Hey there, <b>dicks!</b> Here's an article about <i>FART HEHE</i>!!!

header.html
--------------
<html>
<head>
<title>This site sucks</title>
<style>
.crap { color: red; font-family: sans-serif; }
</style>
</head>
<body background="horriblebackground.gif" class="crap">

footer.html
-------------
</body>
</html>

$ cat header.html base-article.html footer.html > article.html

by **Ice Cream Jonsey** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 1:14 pm

I think I'm good with the white text on black background that the main site shows. One of the reason that I haven't taken your collective awesome posts and made them articles is because I knew that I was going to change what this site looked like eventually, I just wasn't sure when.

I am not sure when. Immediately.

What I'd like to do is have the text of a "feature" be in HTML or XML. All by itself. I would then like an HTML "shell" to wrap around it. So therefore I can change what the site looks like later without having to re-imagine the hardcoded crap on my content.

Is that possible? Am I an idiot for thinking this? I KNOW it's possible.

How would I even begin to do that? How would I begin to have a website that essentially just displays some HTML where Knuckles is ragging on liberals and show bolding, links and italic text but let color be determined by the parent file?

Hey, the new website will look like shit

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: Hey, the new website will look like shit

Hey, the new website will look like shit