Gimmie my props, Kingsman

Ice Cream Jonsey · Post by **Ice Cream Jonsey** » Sun Nov 17, 2002 11:04 pm

Pennington > Vick

Da King · Post by **Da King** » Sun Nov 24, 2002 2:08 pm

Yeah, good call on Pennington over Vick. If only I hadn't played against "Broken Ankle" McNabb and Hines "Games over, time to rack up points" Ward (over 70 combined points), I would've won.

Luckily, my choice of QB was not the difference in the game.

Ice Cream Jonsey · Post by **Ice Cream Jonsey** » Sun Nov 24, 2002 5:25 pm

Who did you play this week?

Da King · Post by **Da King** » Thu Nov 28, 2002 11:31 pm

Are you kidding me? Vick against Minnesota all the way. Its not even a consideration.

Pennington may have the better receivers, but Vick has put up the most consistent numbers. Gotta go with MV!

Ice Cream Jonsey · Post by **Ice Cream Jonsey** » Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:22 pm

Well, when I wrote that it was regarding the week before this one (before Atl-Min, in other words). There seems to be a weekly drift in terms of answers and replies here.

In other news, I am liking the Saints chances. Sure, we lost to the Lions, Browns and Falcons twice, but we've also beat the Bucs twice, the Packers, the Steelers and the 49ers. (Comedy Bears Win should be noted as well, I think.) I would much rather have a team that blows it against the Browns and Lions than Packers and Bucs.

That, plus the Giants losing to the ... heh.... heheheh... HAHHAAHHAHAHA.... TEXANS (Fassel needs to be fired, who's with me? Put yer cards on the table! You're either with us or against us! Run the table! Ha-HA!) means that there is definitely no other team than the six currently in line for the playoffs that ought to be there.

Also: The NFC South is the most competitive division in football. I'd just like to say that, as just about every mindless drone sportswriter decided that it would be, by far, the weakest one back in August.