Pinback and FlyingCarp cook GOULASH!
Moderators: AArdvark, Ice Cream Jonsey
- pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
Pinback and FlyingCarp cook GOULASH!
I have Hungarian blood in my veins (I forget what percentage I am -- it's small, but enough), which is probably why this is still one of my favorite things ever, and why I try to use Hungarian paprika as often and as much as possible.
BUT -- I've never made real, authentic GOULASH, or whatever weird foreign way the 'Carp likes to spell it.
So in honor of the dearly departed Miguel Ferrer, both Bob Morton and I made a mistake. Now it's time to erase that mistake!
In this thread, I will hunt for the best recipe possible, and FlyingCarp will approve or decline them, and/or offer his own recipe, and then we will all decide which is the best one to make, and then I will make it, and we will all have fun and eat red food.
Ready? READY!??
First submission: http://allrecipes.com/recipe/19954/hungarian-goulash-i/
My main concern with this is that "2 tbsp" seems like way too little paprika. I would in fact look askance at any Hungarian recipe that calls for any less than a quarter cup.
WHAT SAY YOU?!
BUT -- I've never made real, authentic GOULASH, or whatever weird foreign way the 'Carp likes to spell it.
So in honor of the dearly departed Miguel Ferrer, both Bob Morton and I made a mistake. Now it's time to erase that mistake!
In this thread, I will hunt for the best recipe possible, and FlyingCarp will approve or decline them, and/or offer his own recipe, and then we will all decide which is the best one to make, and then I will make it, and we will all have fun and eat red food.
Ready? READY!??
First submission: http://allrecipes.com/recipe/19954/hungarian-goulash-i/
My main concern with this is that "2 tbsp" seems like way too little paprika. I would in fact look askance at any Hungarian recipe that calls for any less than a quarter cup.
WHAT SAY YOU?!
Am I a hero? I really can't say. But, yes.
- FlyingCarp
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:19 am
First off, that recipe you started with is not even close to "authentic" if that's what you're after. I'm sure it'd taste good, but no Hungarian, Czech or Slovak would recognize that as goulash, guláš, or gulyás.
If you're going for Hungarian, here's what looks like a pretty good recipe from an ex-pat living in Hungary. One thng is that Hungarian gulyás does not have noodles, dumplings or other shit like that in it. You eat it with bread. The Slovaks do it the same way.
http://www.paprikaproject.com/authentic ... -the-week/
Here's a video of a Hungarian woman making the real deal:
[youtube][/youtube]
Here's one more that looks best to me. This is the Czech "hospodský guláš". Hospodsky is the adjective form of "pub". Hopefully Translate can make this one intelligible for you and that you can cook using the metric system.
http://www.toprecepty.cz/recept/4007-kl ... -vidensky/
If you're going for Hungarian, here's what looks like a pretty good recipe from an ex-pat living in Hungary. One thng is that Hungarian gulyás does not have noodles, dumplings or other shit like that in it. You eat it with bread. The Slovaks do it the same way.
http://www.paprikaproject.com/authentic ... -the-week/
Here's a video of a Hungarian woman making the real deal:
[youtube][/youtube]
Here's one more that looks best to me. This is the Czech "hospodský guláš". Hospodsky is the adjective form of "pub". Hopefully Translate can make this one intelligible for you and that you can cook using the metric system.
http://www.toprecepty.cz/recept/4007-kl ... -vidensky/
- pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
Translated, it looks pretty identical to the one I posted. TWO TABLESPOONS OF PAPRIKA, though. Man. Alright, well. I guess stick with the experts. That just seems wrong, though.
Also, the main ingredient of the beef goulash recipe you posted, when translated, is:
"500 g beef goulash"
Why don't I just get that, and call it a day.
Also, the main ingredient of the beef goulash recipe you posted, when translated, is:
"500 g beef goulash"
Why don't I just get that, and call it a day.
Am I a hero? I really can't say. But, yes.
- pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
FlyingCarp wrote:...gulyás does not have noodles, dumplings or other shit like that in it. You eat it with bread. The Slovaks do it the same way.
I'm beginning to doubt the veracity of your authenticity.That recipe you just posted wrote:Serve sprinkled with freshly chopped onion, preferably with dumplings, or with potato or pasta.
Am I a hero? I really can't say. But, yes.
- FlyingCarp
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:19 am
They mean 'stew beef'. I really think you should do the one from the Paprika Project website now that I'm looking a little closer. That one is Hungarian and has what I've come to consider an important part of a good goulash: both pork and beef.pinback wrote:Translated, it looks pretty identical to the one I posted. TWO TABLESPOONS OF PAPRIKA, though. Man. Alright, well. I guess stick with the experts. That just seems wrong, though.
Also, the main ingredient of the beef goulash recipe you posted, when translated, is:
"500 g beef goulash"
Why don't I just get that, and call it a day.
The Czech goulash is a served on a plate and is basically a thick sauce with meat in it that is eaten with dumplings. The Hungarian and Slovak goulash is eaten from a bowl and is a thicker stew with pork, beef, potatoes, and peppers in it.
- FlyingCarp
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:19 am
Those must not be real Hungarians....backs away.pinback wrote:FlyingCarp wrote:...gulyás does not have noodles, dumplings or other shit like that in it. You eat it with bread. The Slovaks do it the same way.I'm beginning to doubt the veracity of your authenticity.That recipe you just posted wrote:Serve sprinkled with freshly chopped onion, preferably with dumplings, or with potato or pasta.
Okay so maybe I was shooting my mouth off a little bit. I should have said that the goulash I'm used to doesn't have dumplings and certainly not pasta. There are lots of regional variations. Heck, the two different villages my parents-in-law come from make pirohy (pierogies) very differently and they're not even 100 miles apart.
- pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
What I normally do when I cook something I've never cooked before is look for a few recipes, and then combine them in a way that makes sense to me.
Both of these look good to me, so perhaps we can mix them together and come up with perfection?
Here are the main differences, where "A" is the one I linked to, and "B" is the one Carpy (may I call you Carpy?) linked to:
1. A says 3 pounds of beef, B says 500g, or 1.1 pounds. I like 3 beefs more than 1, but we need to see how the rest of the ingredients play out.
2. A says 1 garlic clove, B says 4. I never use "1 garlic clove", so this is an obvious win for B.
3. B adds cumin and marjoram, which A doesn't. Cumin seems an odd choice. Marjoram, or perhaps oregano, rarely hurts anything, though.
4. Technique-wise, they're pretty similar. Interestingly, A says just dump a bunch of water in and let it burble, where B says put a little in, and then continue to add once it dries up. I'd probably go for A here, because B seems a little fussy. (Oddly, B never actually mentions when to put in the paprika, where A recommends seasoning the beef with it before even putting it in the pan. Not sure, here.)
When there are differences like this, sometimes I'll just go with what I think sounds best -- 4 garlics (or more!) instead of 1, no cumin, etc. However, when it's severe (1 pound vs. 3?!) I'll hit up other recipes and look for a general trend.
A quick review shows that other recipes range between 1.5 and 2.5 pounds. So yeah, I guess it's "anywhere between 1 and 3 pounds" of beef.
We're honing in on it!
Both of these look good to me, so perhaps we can mix them together and come up with perfection?
Here are the main differences, where "A" is the one I linked to, and "B" is the one Carpy (may I call you Carpy?) linked to:
1. A says 3 pounds of beef, B says 500g, or 1.1 pounds. I like 3 beefs more than 1, but we need to see how the rest of the ingredients play out.
2. A says 1 garlic clove, B says 4. I never use "1 garlic clove", so this is an obvious win for B.
3. B adds cumin and marjoram, which A doesn't. Cumin seems an odd choice. Marjoram, or perhaps oregano, rarely hurts anything, though.
4. Technique-wise, they're pretty similar. Interestingly, A says just dump a bunch of water in and let it burble, where B says put a little in, and then continue to add once it dries up. I'd probably go for A here, because B seems a little fussy. (Oddly, B never actually mentions when to put in the paprika, where A recommends seasoning the beef with it before even putting it in the pan. Not sure, here.)
When there are differences like this, sometimes I'll just go with what I think sounds best -- 4 garlics (or more!) instead of 1, no cumin, etc. However, when it's severe (1 pound vs. 3?!) I'll hit up other recipes and look for a general trend.
A quick review shows that other recipes range between 1.5 and 2.5 pounds. So yeah, I guess it's "anywhere between 1 and 3 pounds" of beef.
We're honing in on it!
Am I a hero? I really can't say. But, yes.
- FlyingCarp
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:19 am
- pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
I did notice quite a few mentions of caraway in other recipes. So we're GO on caraway and marjoram.
I'm willing to consider peppers and tomatoes, though it already has tomato paste, so... well. Why don't you get a recipe from her and we'll just do it that way?
I'm willing to consider peppers and tomatoes, though it already has tomato paste, so... well. Why don't you get a recipe from her and we'll just do it that way?
Am I a hero? I really can't say. But, yes.
- pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
- FlyingCarp
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:19 am
- pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
- FlyingCarp
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:19 am
- pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
- FlyingCarp
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:19 am
It should be said that goulash can be made with any meat. I've had it with mutton before and even goat goulash from a goat my father-in-law and I put out of its pastoral misery earlier that day.
Still, the pork & beef combo cannot be beat. Unless you have some prejudice against pigs, hoof it to the store and pick up some cutlets.
Still, the pork & beef combo cannot be beat. Unless you have some prejudice against pigs, hoof it to the store and pick up some cutlets.
- pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
- Flack
- Posts: 9057
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:02 pm
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
- pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
- pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
Well, there ya go. The picture is blurry for some reason, but you get the idea.

I give the recipe, and the overall meal, ten goulashes out of ten. The cut of beef I used was very lean, and did not tender up the way you'd want, even after 2 hours of simmering. Maybe use chuck next time? Or "pork", as FlyingCarp recommends.
This has been... the goulash thread or whatever.

I give the recipe, and the overall meal, ten goulashes out of ten. The cut of beef I used was very lean, and did not tender up the way you'd want, even after 2 hours of simmering. Maybe use chuck next time? Or "pork", as FlyingCarp recommends.
This has been... the goulash thread or whatever.
Am I a hero? I really can't say. But, yes.
- FlyingCarp
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:19 am
Looks pretty....decent.
I get more of a Czech Pub Goulash vibe than a Hungarian goulash vibe. I showed my wife and she said, "Not bad.....it's good." Contradicting what I think (which she does well), she thinks it looks more Hungarian than Slovak because the sauce is reddish and thick showing the seasoning. Slovak tends to be more like a stew. I think Czech b/c of the lack of potatoes and other discernible stuff in there besides the meat.
Still, we'd both stick a fork in it.
I get more of a Czech Pub Goulash vibe than a Hungarian goulash vibe. I showed my wife and she said, "Not bad.....it's good." Contradicting what I think (which she does well), she thinks it looks more Hungarian than Slovak because the sauce is reddish and thick showing the seasoning. Slovak tends to be more like a stew. I think Czech b/c of the lack of potatoes and other discernible stuff in there besides the meat.
Still, we'd both stick a fork in it.