SC2 made me a better 4X player, because SC2 is nothing but a 4X game sped up by a factor of a thousand. It's amazing, but ALL of the concepts translate directly.
This is my thought for the moment.
SC2 vs. 4X
Moderator: Ice Cream Jonsey
-
pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
SC2 vs. 4X
Am I a hero? I really can't say. But, yes.
-
RetroRomper
- Posts: 1926
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:35 am
- Location: Someplace happy.
-
pinback
- Posts: 17849
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
Well, you do all four of those things in SC2.
Moreover, the basic, overarching strategy of both is, essentially:
Focus on building "workers" (SC2) or "population" (4x) as much and as fast as possible until you 1) are able to shift resources to research, and/or 2) are forced to shift resources to military.
Moreover, the basic, overarching strategy of both is, essentially:
Focus on building "workers" (SC2) or "population" (4x) as much and as fast as possible until you 1) are able to shift resources to research, and/or 2) are forced to shift resources to military.
Am I a hero? I really can't say. But, yes.
-
The Happiness Engine
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 4:16 pm
I think in both you are basically balancing the expansion of economy, military, and map knowledge/control. In a 4X you spend 10 of hours stroking your chin as you contemplate turn 46, while in SC2 you have to have all of this established in about 5-7 minutes.
Watching LagTV laugh at shitty players fail at this has actually done a lot more for my understanding than trying to make sense of a pro-level cast.
Watching LagTV laugh at shitty players fail at this has actually done a lot more for my understanding than trying to make sense of a pro-level cast.