I am stupid for thinking what I want to.

by **Jethro Q. Walrustitty** » Thu Oct 02, 2003 9:17 am

You people are confusing simple prejudices (ie, "hate") with some agenda.

Like Worm, I hate drug users. As a "group" - individually, I've known a few who have done some and occasionally, they're decent people. But as a group? Hate 'em.

I also hate people with tattoos, yet I married one. I hate guys who walk around with their pants below their butt cheeks and baggy boxers shown for all the world. I hate chicks with too much makeup and a bitchy attitude. I hate people who drive (hell, even like) Corvettes. I hate conservative Republicans. I hate most of the local radio DJs. I hate Robert Palmer, too, and was not saddened to hear of his death.

POINT: Everyone "hates" some others, whether it's tree-huggers, potheads, car salesmen, sluts, liberals, gun nuts, or whatever. This is not always rational. (Why should it bother me if someone wants to decorate their body with ink? It shouldn't, but it does.) It does not mean that we're likely to take a gun and start hunting these people down. As much as I can't stand, say, Rush Limbaugh, I'm not running around trying to get him off the air. My preference would be that no one would listen to him and he'd have to go into a new line of work, or there's be some scandal - like the one now where he's hooked on prescription drugs. Ahhh, full circle!

So, don't try to get Worm to explain why he hates potsmokers. You won't get a rational answer. But it doesn't mean that he's mentally unbalanced or needs a shrink and it definitely doesn't mean that he needs to go smoke a bowl to feel better.

by **Lysander** » Thu Oct 02, 2003 7:10 am

ur all gay. hahaha

by **Worm** » Thu Oct 02, 2003 4:22 am

casual observer wrote:You're creepy. Seriously, it sounds like you are sitting in front of your computer dressed all in black (or even worse in some preppy outfit like brown pants and denim shirt) with a gun in one hand and your dick in another.

Most people with half a brain are more scared of people like you than of a pothead.

That's really cute. So, it's over. Strop trolling the entire board. Your posts really are not very intelligent. I'm not shitting out nuclear physics theory here. Go to www.caltrops.com to see how you troll correctly. You seriously fucked this up, it is a botched abortion of a Trolling. Leave because even stopped trolling you obviously do not belong here.

* You prided yourself on really warring on my idea set, as if it was something anyone else at this board couldn't do. They all could and much better than you ever could. Pinback, Jonsey, Debaser, PTX, or Roody, could very well change my ideas, you are internet trash when put next to these people.
* Most of your posts weren't even arguments. The one or two posts you made that were about my ideals weren't so great and the others were about how I must love the bible to hate drugs . They were canned responses.
* You went about things in a sporadic GameFAQs poster manner. You claimed to go anywhere that "bullshit needed to be disproved" (As if I had anywhere near proved my "bullshit"?) though you just searched the forum licking your lips and rubbing your hands in a sickly manner looking for anywhere that you could make any post that would awfully "embarrass" me.

by **Lex** » Thu Oct 02, 2003 1:02 am

Isn't there a word for someone who indiscriminantly hates someone who has used drugs? Like, as if they are tainted by evil itself just for being interested in experimenting with their own bodies' chemicals? Seriously, we've got Racist Ageist, etc.; I'm just wondering about the one for this.

Maybe he's right, I dunno, but I have a lot of friend who enjoy smoking weed, all of whom grow their own rather than give their money to GodKnowsWhat; some of them are truly lovely people whom I couldn't live without. I don't want them to die.

:(

by **casual observer** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:47 pm

Worm wrote:The funniest thing is you are right.

It is that we need more reform. The prison system is a mess. Granted this whole reform not prison cells has been around awhile I don't know what book everyone who gets into this argument with me has read though I'd like to know. It is the Christian influence that did all this and it did severely mess shit up. We'd be much better off if Philip and Morris were selling weed as opposed to cigarettes.

I'm not saying I know about what our government should do. I'm not trying to inform you all I have the best plan ever that would be better in the long run for everyone. I never claimed the intellectual high ground. I just would like to see the dealers ... hell even the users be put to death. I hate the whole drug scene that much. It's nice to pretend I must have some preestablished political idea set or something.

I just hate people who do drugs and every fucking day of my life is a suppressing and ignoring that. It isn't because of religion, it isn't because of some imposed set of morals, I can say it's because I don't want people to die ... though I really don't care if I don't know them, and truth be told when I do I don't care much either, I just want them to die because I hate them. Pure and simple. Maybe I thought leaving out the user part would make it seem less nuts or the stupid little three strike thing. I don't really know. I just hate drugs and every day all I see are alcoholics and drug bags breathing down my neck. I thought for a millisecond maybe someone wouldn't be someone I have to totally blank out aspects of to like.

You're creepy. Seriously, it sounds like you are sitting in front of your computer dressed all in black (or even worse in some preppy outfit like brown pants and denim shirt) with a gun in one hand and your dick in another.

Most people with half a brain are more scared of people like you than of a pothead.

by **Worm** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:38 pm

The funniest thing is you are right.

It is that we need more reform. The prison system is a mess. Granted this whole reform not prison cells has been around awhile I don't know what book everyone who gets into this argument with me has read though I'd like to know. It is the Christian influence that did all this and it did severely mess shit up. We'd be much better off if Philip and Morris were selling weed as opposed to cigarettes.

I'm not saying I know about what our government should do. I'm not trying to inform you all I have the best plan ever that would be better in the long run for everyone. I never claimed the intellectual high ground. I just would like to see the dealers ... hell even the users be put to death. I hate the whole drug scene that much. It's nice to pretend I must have some preestablished political idea set or something.

I just hate people who do drugs and every fucking day of my life is a suppressing and ignoring that. It isn't because of religion, it isn't because of some imposed set of morals, I can say it's because I don't want people to die ... though I really don't care if I don't know them, and truth be told when I do I don't care much either, I just want them to die because I hate them. Pure and simple. Maybe I thought leaving out the user part would make it seem less nuts or the stupid little three strike thing. I don't really know. I just hate drugs and every day all I see are alcoholics and drug bags breathing down my neck. I thought for a millisecond maybe someone wouldn't be someone I have to totally blank out aspects of to like.

by **casual** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 8:03 pm

Wow, fifteen people on the board at once back in March! That would be really something if it could happen again. In the meantime your ideas are only embarrassing you in front of three or four people at any one time.

Worm wrote:speaking of how my stupid ideas are embarrassing me in front of the whole fifteen people who visit this board?

by **worm's new tag line** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:42 pm

Worm, here's a new tag line for you.

Worm wrote:the son bites my moon and the guys go down. I'll be floating, squirming, and laughing. Next position? That'd be me face up tossing salad."

by **gimmick** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:38 pm

Heh. . . you mispelled *rimJOB* you maggot

Worm wrote:No, I type like that. *rimshot*

by **gimmick** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:37 pm

Who knows, perhaps your entire "Worm" persona is fictional, something you felt was interesting to generate content. Perhaps you were not serious when you said that we should start offing "these" people. If so, then I am glad to have helped you contribute to "content".

Worm wrote:
gimmick. . . melting away wrote:Whoopee!!! How great!!

Actually I'm getting bored as we speak and most likely will not keep posting until something else interesting happens.

Worm wrote:Oh, dear, you aren't though. Posting on topic that is. How great.
You actually believed my intial ideas were interesting?

by **Worm** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:34 pm

No, I type like that. *rimshot*

by **gimmick** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:33 pm

How old are you? over 20? Who talks like this?

Worm wrote:What are you disproving? I just think we should start offing these people. I didn't say I could prove it scientifically.

by **Worm** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:32 pm

gimmick. . . melting away wrote:Whoopee!!! How great!!

Actually I'm getting bored as we speak and most likely will not keep posting until something else interesting happens.

Worm wrote:Oh, dear, you aren't though. Posting on topic that is. How great.

You actually believed my intial ideas were interesting?

by **Worm** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:31 pm

What are you disproving? I just think we should start offing these people. I didn't say I could prove it scientifically.

by **gimmick** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:24 pm

Yeah, that's just about right. Sorry there are only fifteen people.

Worm wrote:I'd just like the double check here. You tactic is to flit about the board posting under my name and pointing out how stupid my ideas are embarrassing me in front of the whole fifteen people who visit this board?

by **Worm** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:23 pm

by **observer** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:22 pm

"Seriously, you think the kills that can be chalked up to video games (not that these can) equal even a fraction of a fraction of the murders because of crime or drunk driving accidents?"

How many people do you think have killed somebody because they're "hepped up on marijahoochhi" as a favorite texas judge of mine liked to say.

Fact is that people are going to drink and do drugs. Always have throughout history and always will. It's the prohibition of these products that leads to the organized crime you speak about and claim to "hate".

If conservatives like you were serious about the evils of drugs then there would be less people in prison for drugs and more people in drug treatment, job training and education. Oops, no money for treatment and job training but we got lots of money to build another 100,000 bed prison where we can make licence plates for $2 a day.

Oh yeah, by the way let's not give enough drug tests, counselling, and education in jail so that people if they ever do get out do so more addicted to the system than anything else.

And while you are at it, let's give the rich a great big tax cut and roll back civil liberties.

I'll keep these posts to any base where disproving bullshit is part of the topic.

by **Worm** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:22 pm

I'd just like the double check here. You tactic is to flit about the board posting under my name and pointing out how stupid my ideas are embarrassing me in front of the whole fifteen people who visit this board?

by **Jack Straw** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:17 pm

Worm wrote:
Gimmick poster wrote:"]Let's look no farther than Columbine and Camden NJ to know that this isn't true.
Seriously, you think the kills that can be chalked up to video games (not that these can) equal even a fraction of a fraction of the murders because of crime or drunk driving accidents?

YEAH! And.. people who smoke weed! That shit turns you into a cold blooded, raping stealing KILLER!

(c)1936

by **Worm** » Wed Oct 01, 2003 7:09 pm

Wormy wrote:I'm confused by your request. It's a fact that posting a message makes this the most recent post of the board so therefore is the first thing people go to when they log in?

How would that help you avoid embarrasment?
Worm wrote:Just go ahead embarrass me some more ... contain it to this thread would you?

Actually, that request was for you to embarrass me more though keep it to one thread.

Gimmick poster wrote:Let's look no farther than Columbine and Camden NJ to know that this isn't true.

Seriously, you think the kills that can be chalked up to video games (not that these can) equal even a fraction of a fraction of the murders because of crime or drunk driving accidents?

I am stupid for thinking what I want to.

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: I am stupid for thinking what I want to.